Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38433887›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques2024

Revolutionizing pharmacokinetics: the dawn of AI-powered analysis.

Ali Ghayoor, Hamed Gilzad Kohan

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Digital Twins and Health Care: an Umbrella Review.Journal of medical systems · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Computational approaches for toxicology and Pharmacokinetic properties prediction.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ali GhayoorCollege of Pharmacy, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, United States.
Hamed Gilzad KohanCollege of Pharmacy, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This editorial explores how artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing the science of pharmacokinetics (PK). It discusses the challenges of conventional PK analysis and how AI has transformed this area. It highlights the promise of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting pharmacokinetic profiles from chemical structures and its application in several aspects of pharmacology, including dosage customization and drug interactions. Additionally, it emphasizes how important ethical issues and openness are to AI applications, especially when it comes to pharmacokinetic prediction and dataset adaptation. Future directions for AI in PK are discussed, with the creation of all-inclusive AI pharmacokinetics/pharmacometrics software being envisioned. Drug discovery and patient care could be transformed toward more individualized and effective healthcare solutions with the help of this software, which could handle tasks such as data cleaning, model selection, and regulatory report preparation. The editorial highlights the importance of AI in improving pharmaceutical sciences while urging caution and teamwork in navigating its possible uses in pharmacokinetics.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSoftwareDrug DiscoveryHumansartificial intelligencecomputational pharmacologymachine learningpharmacokinetic predictionpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID38433887
PMCPMC10906815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.