Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38433886›Full record

ArticleCanadian geriatrics journal : CGJ2024

Timely Yet Long Overdue: Canadian Standards for Long-Term Care Homes.

Julia Kirkham, Alvin Keng, David Conn, Sophiya Benjamin, Dallas Seitz, Marie-France Rivard, Brenda Martinussen, Cindy Grief, Claire Checkland, Kiran Rabheru and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian geriatrics journal : CGJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Experience of Conjugality Among Older People in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Julia KirkhamDepartment of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
Alvin KengDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
David ConnDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Sophiya BenjaminDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
Dallas SeitzDepartment of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
Marie-France RivardDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
Brenda MartinussenCanadian Coalition for Senior's Mental Health, Toronto, ON.
Cindy GriefDepartment of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Claire ChecklandCanadian Coalition for Senior's Mental Health, Toronto, ON.
Kiran RabheruDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
Canadian Coalition for Senior’s Mental Health (CCSMH) Policy Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted systemic problems in Canadian long-term care (LTC). While high mortality rates in LTC received significant attention, the pandemic also took an enormous toll on mental health of LTC residents, where mental health conditions, including cognitive disorders, are already much higher than in other community settings. The pandemic resulted in a renewed interest in improving quality of care in LTC and led to the recent development of several National Standards of Canada. The newly available Standards set ambitious targets, but many of the standards are practical and essential to moving beyond a focus on safety and physical needs in LTC and towards one that supports residents as whole persons. While the standards support good mental health indirectly, there is a need to recognize mental health in these settings as a fundamental human right and essential to quality of life, and for this to be reflected in ongoing and future standards development. Ensuring existing and forthcoming National Standards are meaningfully implemented, in whole or in part, will require extensive efforts at multiple levels. The guidance provided by Canadian Standards will shape this transformative process, necessitating aligned federal and provincial investments and policies, and stakeholder engagement to bring about the envisioned high-quality care.

Indexed as

aging carehuman rightsmental healthmental health carequality of carequality of liferesidential care

Identifiers

PMID38433886
PMCPMC10896204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.