ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Prolonged Button Battery Exposure Leading to Severe Ocular Injury without Heavy Metal Poisoning.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Prolonged exposure to a complete button battery can cause severe tissue necrosis in the eye and permanent impairment of visual function. The main mechanism of injury is the current generated by the hydrolysis of tissue fluid at the negative electrode and the production of hydroxide ions. Case Presentation: A 3-year-old girl went to the local hospital because of swelling and pain in her right eye of 12-h duration. The local doctor performed an orbital CT (computed tomography) scan and found a foreign body between the right eyelid and the eyeball. The foreign body was removed immediately under general anesthesia. In addition, it was found that the foreign body was a button battery, but it prolonged 39 h from the onset of the child's symptoms. The child underwent a second operation in our hospital and received amniotic membrane transplantation combined with conjunctival flap coverage. Topical corticosteroid and antibiotic eye ointment were continued for 3 months after surgery. Local pigmentation was seen, there was no symblepharon, but the cornea was still opaque and the visual acuity was only FC (finger count). In this particular case, heavy metal testing conducted on the child's blood fortunately revealed that the levels were within the normal range. Conclusion: Early detection and urgent removal of button battery are crucial in order to minimize exposure time. We should also be concerned about heavy metals in the blood. Children should be kept away from button batteries as much as possible to avoid such injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.