Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38433646›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Adaptive multipole models of optically pumped magnetometer data.

Tim M Tierney, Zelekha Seedat, Kelly St Pier, Stephanie Mellor, Gareth R Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spatial-Jitter Model for Magnetoencephalography Sensor Arrays.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Enhanced Neural Decoding With Optically Pumped Magnetometer MEG Using Multivariate Pattern Analysis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Potential ofEpilepsia open · 2025
    Article
  6. SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Wearable Magnetoencephalography in a Lightly Shielded Environment.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Article
  10. Determining sensor geometry and gain in a wearable MEG system.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  11. NovelImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Optimal configuration of on-scalp OPMs with fixed channel counts.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tim M TierneyDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-7575-679X
Zelekha SeedatDiagnostic Suite, Young Epilepsy, St Piers Lane, Surrey, UK.
Kelly St PierDiagnostic Suite, Young Epilepsy, St Piers Lane, Surrey, UK.
Stephanie MellorDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Gareth R BarnesDepartment of Imaging Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5396-7712

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multipole expansions have been used extensively in the Magnetoencephalography (MEG) literature for mitigating environmental interference and modelling brain signal. However, their application to Optically Pumped Magnetometer (OPM) data is challenging due to the wide variety of existing OPM sensor and array designs. We therefore explore how such multipole models can be adapted to provide stable models of brain signal and interference across OPM systems. Firstly, we demonstrate how prolate spheroidal (rather than spherical) harmonics can provide a compact representation of brain signal when sampling on the scalp surface with as few as 100 channels. We then introduce a type of orthogonal projection incorporating this basis set. The Adaptive Multipole Models (AMM), which provides robust interference rejection across systems, even in the presence of spatially structured nonlinearity errors (shielding factor is the reciprocal of the maximum fractional nonlinearity error). Furthermore, this projection is always stable, as it is an orthogonal projection, and will only ever decrease the white noise in the data. However, for array designs that are suboptimal for spatially separating brain signal and interference, this method can remove brain signal components. We contrast these properties with the more typically used multipole expansion, Signal Space Separation (SSS), which never reduces brain signal amplitude but is less robust to the effect of sensor nonlinearity errors on interference rejection and can increase noise in the data if the system is sub-optimally designed (as it is an oblique projection). We conclude with an empirical example utilizing AMM to maximize signal to noise ratio (SNR) for the stimulus locked neuronal response to a flickering visual checkerboard in a 128-channel OPM system and demonstrate up to 40 dB software shielding in real data.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetoencephalographyHumansScalpSignal-To-Noise RatioSoftwareinterference correctionMagnetoencephalographyoptically pumped magnetometer

Identifiers

PMID38433646
PMCPMC10910270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.