ArticleHuman brain mapping2024
Adaptive multipole models of optically pumped magnetometer data.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurement Equivalence of On-Scalp OPM-MEG and Cryogenic MEG for Auditory and Somatosensory Cortical Mapping Across Development.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Spatial-Jitter Model for Magnetoencephalography Sensor Arrays.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Enhanced Neural Decoding With Optically Pumped Magnetometer MEG Using Multivariate Pattern Analysis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- The Mismatch Negativity Compared: EEG, SQUID-MEG, and NovelHuman brain mapping · 2025Article
- Potential ofEpilepsia open · 2025Article
- SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Review
- Using Wearable MEG to Study the Neural Control of Human Stepping.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Wearable MEG data recorded during human stepping.Data in brief · 2025Article
- Wearable Magnetoencephalography in a Lightly Shielded Environment.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Determining sensor geometry and gain in a wearable MEG system.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- NovelImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Optimal configuration of on-scalp OPMs with fixed channel counts.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Optimizing magnetometers arrays and analysis pipelines for multivariate pattern analysis.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2024Article
- Noise Reduction and Localization Accuracy in a Mobile Magnetoencephalography System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Adaptive multipole models of optically pumped magnetometer data.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Towards non-invasive imaging through spinal-cord generated magnetic fields.Frontiers in medical technology · 2024Article
- Channel gain calibrated signal space projection using variational Bayesian estimation for optically pumped magnetometers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multipole expansions have been used extensively in the Magnetoencephalography (MEG) literature for mitigating environmental interference and modelling brain signal. However, their application to Optically Pumped Magnetometer (OPM) data is challenging due to the wide variety of existing OPM sensor and array designs. We therefore explore how such multipole models can be adapted to provide stable models of brain signal and interference across OPM systems. Firstly, we demonstrate how prolate spheroidal (rather than spherical) harmonics can provide a compact representation of brain signal when sampling on the scalp surface with as few as 100 channels. We then introduce a type of orthogonal projection incorporating this basis set. The Adaptive Multipole Models (AMM), which provides robust interference rejection across systems, even in the presence of spatially structured nonlinearity errors (shielding factor is the reciprocal of the maximum fractional nonlinearity error). Furthermore, this projection is always stable, as it is an orthogonal projection, and will only ever decrease the white noise in the data. However, for array designs that are suboptimal for spatially separating brain signal and interference, this method can remove brain signal components. We contrast these properties with the more typically used multipole expansion, Signal Space Separation (SSS), which never reduces brain signal amplitude but is less robust to the effect of sensor nonlinearity errors on interference rejection and can increase noise in the data if the system is sub-optimally designed (as it is an oblique projection). We conclude with an empirical example utilizing AMM to maximize signal to noise ratio (SNR) for the stimulus locked neuronal response to a flickering visual checkerboard in a 128-channel OPM system and demonstrate up to 40 dB software shielding in real data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.