ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2024
Evaluation of the Anatomical Reference Point in Posterior Minimally Invasive Atlantoaxial Spine Surgery: A Cadaveric Anatomical Study.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMinimally invasive atlantoaxial surgery offers the benefits of reduced trauma and quicker recovery. Previous studies have focused on feasibility and technical aspects, but the lack of comprehensive safety information has limited its availability and widespread use. This study proposes to define the feasibility and range of surgical safety using the intersection of the greater occipital nerve and the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique as a reference point.
methodsDissection was performed on 10 fresh cadavers to define the anatomical reference point as the intersection of the greater occipital nerve and the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique muscle. The study aimed to analyze the safety range of minimally invasive atlantoaxial fusion surgery by measuring the distance between the anatomical reference point and the transverse foramen of the axis, the distance between the anatomical reference point and the superior border of the posterior arch of the atlas, and the distance between the anatomical reference point and the spinal canal. Measurements were compared using Student's t test.
resultsThe point where the occipital greater nerve intersects with the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique muscle was defined as the anatomical marker for minimally invasive posterior atlantoaxial surgery. The distance between this anatomical marker and the transverse foramen of the axis was measured to be 9.32 ± 2.04 mm. Additionally, the distance to the superior border of the posterior arch of the atlas was found to be 21.29 ± 1.93 mm, and the distance to the spinal canal was measured to be 11.53 ± 2.18 mm. These measurement results can aid surgeons in protecting the vertebral artery and dura mater during minimally invasive posterior atlantoaxial surgery.
conclusionsThe intersection of the greater occipital nerve with the inferior border of the inferior cephalic oblique muscle is a safe and reliable anatomical landmark in minimally invasive posterior atlantoaxial surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.