ArticleProblemy endokrinologii2024
[Machine learning methods in differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism].
Article in Problemy endokrinologii, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of transcription factor-lipid droplet-related gene biomarkers for the prognosis of post-acute myocardial infarction-induced heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo develop a noninvasive method of differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of an optimal algorithm for predicting the probability of ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS) obtained using machine learning methods based on the analysis of clinical data. MATERIALS AND
methodsAs part of a single-center, one-stage, cohort study, a retrospective prediction of the probability of EAS among patients with ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism was carried out. Patients were randomly stratified into 2 samples: training (80%) and test (20%). Eleven machine learning algorithms were used to develop predictive models: Linear Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, elastic network (GLMNET), Support Vector machine (SVM Radial), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), Naive Bayes, binary decision tree (CART), C5.0 decision tree algorithms, Bagged CART, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting (Stochastic Gradient Boosting, GBM).
resultsThe study included 223 patients (163 women, 60 men) with ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism, of which 175 patients with Cushing's disease (CD), 48 - with EAS. As a result of preliminary data processing and selection of the most informative signs, the final variables for the classification and prediction of EAS were selected: ACTH level at 08:00 hours, potassium level (the minimum value of potassium in the active stage of the disease), 24-h urinary free cortisol, late-night serum cortisol, late-night salivary cortisol, the largest size of pituitary adenoma according to MRI of the brain. The best predictive ability in a training sample of all trained machine learning models for all three final metrics (ROC-AUC (0.867), sensitivity (90%), specificity (56.4%)) demonstrated a model of gradient boosting (Generalized Boosted Modeling, GBM). In the test sample, the AUC, sensitivity and specificity of the model in predicting EAS were 0.920; 77.8% and 97.1%, respectively.
conclusionThe prognostic model based on machine learning methods makes it possible to differentiate patients with EAS and CD based on basic clinical results and can be used as a primary screening of patients with ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.