Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38433296›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental dental research2024

Evaluation of the modified 3Mix-Simvastatin combination in non-instrumental endodontic therapy of necrotic primary molars: A two-arm randomized controlled trial.

Walaa Almarji, Mohannad Laflouf, Yasser Alsayed Tolibah

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06478940 phase1unknown statusnot on this map

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of 3Mixtatin Versus MTA Used as Pulpotomy Agents in Vital Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsPulp Disease, Dental, Deciduous TeethArms3 mixtatin pulpotomy, MTA pulpotomy
NCT07773805 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Clinical and Radiographic Success of Calcium Hydroxide Iodoform Paste Versus Modified Triple Antibiotic Paste for the Treatment of Necrotic Primary Molars Using LSTR Technique: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2027 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsDental Pulp Necrosis, Periapical Diseases, Dental Caries, Primary TeethArmsCalcium Hydroxide, Iodoform, paste, modified triple antibiotic paste
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Walaa AlmarjiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Mohannad LafloufDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Yasser Alsayed TolibahDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.ORCID 0000-0001-5498-9991
Damascus University · SY

Funding

Damascus University 501100020595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of non-instrumentation endodontic treatment (NIET) using a modified antibiotic mix of cefixime, ciprofloxacin and metronidazole with simvastatin (an anti-inflammatory, bone regeneration drug) on necrotic primary molars compared to conventional pulpectomy to help preservation of necrotic primary teeth until its natural exfoliation. MATERIALS AND

methodsForty mandibular primary second molars with necrotic pulp tissue from 38 healthy patients aged between 4 and 8 years were randomly assigned to two groups with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Group A teeth underwent conventional root canal treatment. The procedure involved a two-visit approach, employing k-files and h-files during the initial visit, followed by the application of calcium hydroxide paste as canal dressing between visits, while Group B teeth were treated with 3Mixtatin. All teeth were clinically evaluated after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and radiographically at 3, 6, and 12 months. Two external examiners assessed the results. Data analysis was conducted using a chi-square test at a 0.05 significance level.

resultsAt the end of the follow-up interval, 90% of teeth in each group exhibited no clinical signs or symptoms. Additionally, inter-radicular radiolucency healing occurred in 75% of cases in the NIET group and 89.5% in the conventional pulpectomy group. However, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups.

conclusionNIET using 3Mixtatin seems to be a good alternative choice to conventional pulpectomy, offering a less complex treatment approach that may help avoid the complications associated with traditional pulpectomy and could be suitable for teeth with shorter roots.

Indexed as

Dental CarePulpectomyAnti-Bacterial AgentsBone RegenerationCalcium HydroxideChildChild, PreschoolHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsCalcium Hydroxidedental pulp necrosislesion sterilization and tissue repairpulpectomyroot canal therapy

Identifiers

PMID38433296
PMCPMC10909793
OpenAlexW4392371805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.