ArticleMicrobial cell factories2024
Automated workflow for characterization of bacteriocin production in natural producers Lactococcus lactis and Latilactobacillus sakei.
Article in Microbial cell factories, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotic-Derived Antimicrobial Proteins and Peptides: Molecular Mechanisms, Clinical Applications, and Future Therapeutic Perspectives.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Bacteriocins as precision antimicrobials: genomic exploration and oral applications of Lactobacillus peptides.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Turbid but accurate: automating lysostaphin quantification including uncertainty quantification.Microbial cell factories · 2026Article
- Source-dependent antimicrobial activity of plant-derived lactic acid bacteria against periodontal pathogens.Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2026Article
- Quantification of nisin concentration from fluorescence-based antimicrobial activity assay using Bayesian calibration.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLactic acid bacteria are commonly used as protective starter cultures in food products. Among their beneficial effects is the production of ribosomally synthesized peptides termed bacteriocins that kill or inhibit food-spoiling bacteria and pathogens, e.g., members of the Listeria species. As new bacteriocins and producer strains are being discovered rapidly, modern automated methods for strain evaluation and bioprocess development are required to accelerate screening and development processes.
resultsIn this study, we developed an automated workflow for screening and bioprocess optimization for bacteriocin producing lactic acid bacteria, consisting of microcultivation, sample processing and automated antimicrobial activity assay. We implemented sample processing workflows to minimize bacteriocin adsorption to producer cells via addition of Tween 80 and divalent cations to the cultivation media as well as acidification of culture broth prior to cell separation. Moreover, we demonstrated the applicability of the automated workflow to analyze influence of media components such as MES buffer or yeast extract for bacteriocin producers Lactococcus lactis B1629 and Latilactobacillus sakei A1608.
conclusionsOur automated workflow provides advanced possibilities to accelerate screening and bioprocess optimization for natural bacteriocin producers. Based on its modular concept, adaptations for other strains, bacteriocin products and applications are easily carried out and a unique tool to support bacteriocin research and bioprocess development is provided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.