Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38433194›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2024

Experiences with and needs for aftercare following the death of a loved one in the ICU: a mixed-methods study among bereaved relatives.

Sophie C Renckens, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Zina Jorna, Hanna T Klop, Chantal du Perron, Lia van Zuylen, Monique A H Steegers, Birkitt L Ten Tusscher, Margo M C van Mol, Wouter de Ruijter and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie C RenckensDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.renckens@amsterdamumc.nl.
Bregje D Onwuteaka-PhilipsenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Zina JornaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hanna T KlopDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chantal du PerronDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lia van ZuylenExpertise Center for Palliative Care Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique A H SteegersExpertise Center for Palliative Care Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Birkitt L Ten TusscherDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Margo M C van MolDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine Adults, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter de RuijterDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
H Roeline PasmanDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLErasmus MC · NLNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NL

Funding

ZonMw 844001801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBereaved relatives of intensive care unit (ICU) patients are at increased risk of psychological complaints. Aftercare might help them cope with processing the ICU admission and their loved one's death. There is little (qualitative) evidence on how bereaved relatives experience aftercare. Also, the COVID-19 pandemic likely impacted aftercare provision. We aim to examine how many relatives in Dutch ICUs received aftercare before and during the pandemic and to qualitatively describe their experiences and needs regarding aftercare.

methodsA mixed-methods study among relatives of patients who died in an ICU before or during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bereaved relatives in six ICUs completed a questionnaire (n = 90), including two items on aftercare. These were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-squared tests. Subsequently, both relatives that received and relatives that did not receive aftercare were interviewed about their experiences and needs regarding aftercare. The interviews were thematically analyzed.

resultsAfter the passing of a loved one, 44% of the relatives were asked by a healthcare professional from the hospital how they were doing, and 26% had had a follow-up conversation. Both happened more often during the first wave of the pandemic than during the second wave or before the pandemic. The most common reason for not having had a follow-up conversation was not knowing about this option (44%), followed by not feeling a need (26%). Regarding the latter, interviewed relatives explained that this would not revive their loved one or that they had already discussed everything they wanted. Relatives who wanted a follow-up conversation, wanted this because this would help them realize the severity of their loved one's illness, to exchange personal experiences, and/or to thank the ICU team. Those with a follow-up conversation said that they had reviewed the medical course of the admission and/or discussed their (mental) well-being.

conclusionsICU healthcare professionals may play a vital role in addressing aftercare needs by asking relatives how they are doing in the weeks following the death of their loved one and offering them a follow-up conversation with an ICU physician. We recommend to include aftercare for bereaved relatives in ICU guidelines.

Indexed as

AftercareCOVID-19Critical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsAftercareBereavementCOVID-19Critical careICU

Identifiers

PMID38433194
PMCPMC10910713
OpenAlexW4392402005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.