ArticleBMC chemistry2024
In silico evaluation of a new compound incorporating 4(3H)-quinazolinone and sulfonamide as a potential inhibitor of a human carbonic anhydrase.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The present study investigates the potential of a new compound containing sulfonamide and 4(3H)-quinazolinone to inhibit the hCA-IIX enzyme using in silico methods. Density functional theory-based calculations of electronic properties have been addressed through the analysis of frontier molecular orbitals, molecule electrostatic potential, and IR and UV-vis spectroscopy data. A molecular electrostatic potential analysis predicts that the target protein will be most inhibited by the sulfonamide groups since it has the highest potential spots for electrophile and nucleophile attack. The investigated compound exhibited good ADMET properties and satisfied the Lipinski rule of drug likeness. The hCA-IIX protein binding affinity with the proposed compound was determined by molecular docking analysis, which revealed a stable conformation with more negative binding energy (-12.19 kcal/mol) than the standard AZA drug (-7.36 kcal/mol). Moreover, a molecular dynamics study confirmed the docking results through trajectory analysis. The RMSD and RMSF both showed convergence and no significant fluctuations during the simulation time, which revealed a stable interaction within the active domain of the target protein. According to these findings, the proposed compound has a good pharmacological nature and could potentially be an efficient drug against hCAIX enzymes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.