ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Influence of build orientation and support structure on additive manufacturing of human knee replacements: a computational study.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing patient-specific implants has an increasing interest in the application of emerging additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. On the other hand, despite advances in total knee replacement (TKR), studies suggest that up to 20% of patients with elective TKR are dissatisfied with the outcome. By creating 3D objects from digital models, AM enables the production of patient-specific implants with complex geometries, such as those required for knee replacements. Previous studies have highlighted concerns regarding the risk of residual stresses and shape distortions in AM parts, which could lead to structural failure or other complications. This article presents a computational framework that uses CT images to create patient-specific finite element models for optimizing AM knee replacements. The workflow includes image processing in the open-source software 3DSlicer and MeshLab and AM process simulations in the commercial platform 3DEXPERIENCE. The approach is demonstrated on a distal femur replacement for a 50-year-old male patient from the open-access Natural Knee Data. The results show that build orientations have a significant impact on both shape distortions and residual stresses. Support structures have a marginal effect on residual stresses but strongly influence shape distortions, whereas conical support exhibits a maximum distortion of 18.5 mm. Future research can explore how these factors affect the functionality of AM knee replacements under in-service loading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38433178What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.