Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38432313›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2024

Bet-hedging and variability in plant development: seed germination and beyond.

Katie Abley, Rituparna Goswami, James C W Locke

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genomic history and ecology of local adaptation in sky-islandbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stochastic processes in development and disease.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Bet-hedging and variability in plant development: seed germination and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katie AbleyThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 1LR, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5524-6786
Rituparna GoswamiThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 1LR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7313-0186
James C W LockeThe Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 1LR, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0670-1943
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When future conditions are unpredictable, bet-hedging strategies can be advantageous. This can involve isogenic individuals producing different phenotypes, under the same environmental conditions. Ecological studies provide evidence that variability in seed germination time has been selected for as a bet-hedging strategy. We demonstrate how variability in germination time found in Arabidopsis could function as a bet-hedging strategy in the face of unpredictable lethal stresses. Despite a body of knowledge on how the degree of seed dormancy versus germination is controlled, relatively little is known about how differences between isogenic seeds in a batch are generated. We review proposed mechanisms for generating variability in germination time and the current limitations and new possibilities for testing the model predictions. We then look beyond germination to the role of variability in seedling and adult plant growth and review new technologies for quantification of noisy gene expression dynamics. We discuss evidence for phenotypic variability in plant traits beyond germination being under genetic control and propose that variability in stress response gene expression could function as a bet-hedging strategy. We discuss open questions about how noisy gene expression could lead to between-plant heterogeneity in gene expression and phenotypes. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Causes and consequences of stochastic processes in development and disease'.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisGerminationAdultHumansKnowledgeSeedlingsSeedsbet-hedgingcomputational modelsgerminationnoise in gene expressionsingle-cell timelapse microscopy

Identifiers

PMID38432313
PMCPMC10909506
OpenAlexW4392343294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.