SynthesisJournal of neurology2024
The efficacy and safety of FcRn inhibitors in patients with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Various Monoclonal Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers in generalized AChR antibody-positive myasthenia gravis: a meta-analysis.Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and immunomodulators in juvenile myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in adults with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Rozanolixizumab: A Review in AChR or MuSK Autoantibody-Positive Generalised Myasthenia Gravis.CNS drugs · 2026Review
- FcRn Inhibition in Autoantibody-Mediated Autoimmune Diseases: From Broad Immunosuppression to Precision IgG Modulation.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2026Review
- Experience Using Efgartigimod to Treat Juvenile Myasthenia Gravis in China: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Muscle & nerve · 2026Article
- Patient Perceptions of Needs and Expectations Regarding the Current Management of Myasthenia Gravis: A Biopsychosocial Study.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Investigating the Risk Factors for Medication Nonadherence in Myasthenia Gravis Patients: Establishing a Nomogram Model.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance analysis of FcRn antagonists in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: A disproportionality analysis based on the FAERS database.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Immunological Targets in Generalized Myasthenia Gravis Treatment: Where Are We Going Now?Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Factors associated with early response to efgartigimod in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis: a multicenter retrospective observational study.Journal of neurology · 2025Observational
- FcRn Blockade as a Targeted Therapeutic Strategy in Antibody-Mediated Autoimmune Diseases: A Focus on Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Postmarketing adverse events of efgartigimod alfa: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Leveraging neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) to enhance antibody transport across the blood brain barrier.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Rozanolixizumab for Myasthenia Gravis: a breakthrough treatment and future prospects.Immunotherapy · 2025Review
- New and Emerging Biological Therapies for Myasthenia Gravis: A Focussed Review for Clinical Decision-Making.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025Review
- A real-world pharmacovigilance study of efgartigimod alfa in the FDA adverse event reporting system database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive review of clinical evidence and future perspectives.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMyasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease that causes local or generalized muscle weakness. Complement inhibitors and targeting of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) to block IgG cycling are two novel and successful mechanisms.
methodsPubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before May 18, 2023. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the data.
resultsWe pooled 532 participants from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Compared to the placebo, the FcRn inhibitors were more efficacy in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) (MD = - 1.69 [- 2.35, - 1.03], P < 0.00001), MG-ADL responder (RR = 2.01 [1.62, 2.48], P < 0.00001), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) (MD = - 2.45 [- 4.35, - 0.55], P = 0.01), Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) (MD = - 2.97 [- 4.27, - 1.67], P < 0.00001), 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MGQoL15r) (MD = - 2.52 [- 3.54, - 1.50], P < 0.00001), without increasing the risk of safety. The subgroup analysis showed that efgartigimod was more effective than placebo in MG-ADL responders. Rozanolixizumab was more effective than the placebo except in QMG, and batoclimab was more effective than the placebo except in MG-ADL responder. Nipocalizumab did not show satisfactory efficacy in all outcomes. With the exception of rozanolixizumab, all drugs showed non-inferior safety profiles to placebo.
conclusionFcRn inhibitors have good efficacy and safety in patients with MG. Among them, efgartigimod and nipocalimab were effective without causing an increased safety risk. Rozanolixizumab, despite its superior efficacy, caused an increased incidence of adverse events. Current evidence does not suggest that nipocalimab is effective in patients with MG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.