Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38431729›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Migraine headache (MH) classification using machine learning methods with data augmentation.

Lal Khan, Moudasra Shahreen, Atika Qazi, Syed Jamil Ahmed Shah, Sabir Hussain, Hsien-Tsung Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Machine learning-based migraine analysis using retinal vessel diameters from optical coherence tomography: an alternative approach.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lal KhanDepartment of Computer Science, Ibadat International University Islamabad Pakpattan Campus, Pakpattan, Pakistan.
Moudasra ShahreenDepartment of Computer Science, Mir Chakar Khan Rind University, Sibi, Pakistan.
Atika QaziCentre for Lifelong Learning, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei Darussalam.
Syed Jamil Ahmed ShahDepartment of Computer Science, Mir Chakar Khan Rind University, Sibi, Pakistan.
Sabir HussainDepartment of Agriculture, Mir Chakar Khan Rind University, Sibi, Pakistan.
Hsien-Tsung ChangBachelor Program in Artificial Intelligence, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. smallpig@cgu.edu.tw.
Chang Gung University · TWUniversiti Brunei Darussalam · BN

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou NERPD4N0231National Science and Technology Council,Taiwan 112-2410-H-182-026-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migraine headache, a prevalent and intricate neurovascular disease, presents significant challenges in its clinical identification. Existing techniques that use subjective pain intensity measures are insufficiently accurate to make a reliable diagnosis. Even though headaches are a common condition with poor diagnostic specificity, they have a significant negative influence on the brain, body, and general human function. In this era of deeply intertwined health and technology, machine learning (ML) has emerged as a crucial force in transforming every aspect of healthcare, utilizing advanced facilities ML has shown groundbreaking achievements related to developing classification and automatic predictors. With this, deep learning models, in particular, have proven effective in solving complex problems spanning computer vision and data analytics. Consequently, the integration of ML in healthcare has become vital, especially in developing countries where limited medical resources and lack of awareness prevail, the urgent need to forecast and categorize migraines using artificial intelligence (AI) becomes even more crucial. By training these models on a publicly available dataset, with and without data augmentation. This study focuses on leveraging state-of-the-art ML algorithms, including support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), decision tree (DST), and deep neural networks (DNN), to predict and classify various types of migraines. The proposed models with data augmentations were trained to classify seven various types of migraine. The proposed models with data augmentations were trained to classify seven various types of migraine. The revealed results show that DNN, SVM, KNN, DST, and RF achieved an accuracy of 99.66%, 94.60%, 97.10%, 88.20%, and 98.50% respectively with data augmentation highlighting the transformative potential of AI in enhancing migraine diagnosis.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMigraine DisordersAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID38431729
PMCPMC10908834
OpenAlexW4392348732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.