Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38431724›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Domain generalization enables general cancer cell annotation in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.

Zhixing Zhong, Junchen Hou, Zhixian Yao, Lei Dong, Feng Liu, Junqiu Yue, Tiantian Wu, Junhua Zheng, Gaoliang Ouyang, Chaoyong Yang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating Spatial Proteogenomics in Cancer Research.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Reinvigorating COTL1Nature cell biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhixing Zhong *Institute of Artificial Intelligence, Department of Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.
Junchen Hou *School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.
Zhixian Yao *Institute of Molecular Medicine, Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Lei Dong *Department of Pathology, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2895-6074
Feng LiuSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5005-9129
Junqiu YueDepartment of Pathology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Tiantian WuSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3846-6052
Junhua ZhengInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5803-8405
Gaoliang OuyangSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2828-2690
Chaoyong YangInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, Department of Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2374-5342
Jia SongInstitute of Molecular Medicine, Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200127, China. songjiajia2010@shsmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-0122-8360

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 21735004National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 21927806National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22104080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell and spatial transcriptome sequencing, two recently optimized transcriptome sequencing methods, are increasingly used to study cancer and related diseases. Cell annotation, particularly for malignant cell annotation, is essential and crucial for in-depth analyses in these studies. However, current algorithms lack accuracy and generalization, making it difficult to consistently and rapidly infer malignant cells from pan-cancer data. To address this issue, we present Cancer-Finder, a domain generalization-based deep-learning algorithm that can rapidly identify malignant cells in single-cell data with an average accuracy of 95.16%. More importantly, by replacing the single-cell training data with spatial transcriptomic datasets, Cancer-Finder can accurately identify malignant spots on spatial slides. Applying Cancer-Finder to 5 clear cell renal cell carcinoma spatial transcriptomic samples, Cancer-Finder demonstrates a good ability to identify malignant spots and identifies a gene signature consisting of 10 genes that are significantly co-localized and enriched at the tumor-normal interface and have a strong correlation with the prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients. In conclusion, Cancer-Finder is an efficient and extensible tool for malignant cell annotation.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingHumansSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID38431724
PMCPMC10908802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.