Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38430916›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2024

Integration of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine into the Essential Programme on Immunisation in western Kenya: a qualitative longitudinal study from the health system perspective.

Jenny Hill, Teresa Bange, Jenna Hoyt, Simon Kariuki, Mohamed F Jalloh, Jayne Webster, George Okello

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
22.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Jenny HillDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: jenny.hill@lstmed.ac.uk.
Teresa BangeKenya Medical Research Institute/Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Jenna HoytDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Simon KariukiKenya Medical Research Institute/Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Mohamed F JallohGlobal Immunization Division, Global Health Center, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Jayne WebsterDisease Control Department, London School of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene, London, UK.
George OkelloDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK; Kenya Medical Research Institute/Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria accounts for over half a million child deaths annually. WHO recommends RTS,S/AS01 to prevent malaria in children living in moderate-to-high malaria transmission regions. We conducted a qualitative longitudinal study to investigate the contextual and dynamic factors shaping vaccine delivery and uptake during a pilot introduction in western Kenya.

methodsThe study was conducted between Oct 3, 2019, and Mar 24, 2022. We conducted participant and non-participant observations and in-depth interviews with health-care providers, health managers, and national policymakers at three timepoints using an iterative approach and observations of practices and processes of malaria vaccine delivery. Transcripts were coded by content analysis using the consolidated framework for implementation research, to which emerging themes were added deductively and categorised into challenges and opportunities.

findingsWe conducted 112 in-depth interviews with 60 participants (25 health-care providers, 27 managers, and eight policy makers). Health-care providers highlighted limitations in RTS,S/AS01 integration into routine immunisation services due to the concurrent pilot evaluation and temporary adaptations for health reporting. Initial challenges related to the complexity of the four-dose schedule (up to 24-months); however, self-efficacy increased over time as the health-care providers gained experience in vaccine delivery. Low uptake of the fourth dose remained a challenge. Health managers cited insufficient trained immunisation staff and inadequate funding for supervision. Confidence in the vaccine increased among all participant groups owing to reductions in malaria frequency and severity.

interpretationIntegration of RTS,S/AS01 into immunisation services in western Kenya presented substantial operational challenges most of which were overcome in the first 2 years, providing important lessons for other countries. Programme expansion is feasible with intensive staff training and retention, enhanced supervision, and defaulter-tracing to ensure uptake of all doses.

fundingPATH via World Health Organization; Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; The Global Fund; and Unitaid.

Indexed as

MalariaMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesChildHumansInfantKenyaLongitudinal StudiesVaccinationMalaria Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID38430916
PMCPMC10932755
OpenAlexW4392247725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.