Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38430459›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2024

Nomogram-based risk assessment model for left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with essential hypertension: Incorporating clinical characteristics and biomarkers.

Chuang-Chang Wang, Li-Keng Liang, Sheng-Ming Luo, Hui-Cheng Wang, Xiao-Li Wang, Ya-Hui Cheng, Guang-Ming Pan, Jiang-Yang Peng, Shu-Jie Han, Xia Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chuang-Chang WangDepartment of Cardiovascular, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Li-Keng LiangYunkang school of medicine and health, Nanfang College, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0744-2955
Sheng-Ming LuoApplicants with the same educational background for master's degree, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Hui-Cheng WangDepartment of Cardiovascular, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao-Li WangDepartment of Cardiovascular, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Ya-Hui ChengDepartment of Cardiovascular, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Guang-Ming PanDepartment of Cardiovascular, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jiang-Yang PengDepartment of Cardiovascular, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Shu-Jie HanDepartment of Cardiovascular, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xia WangDepartment of Cardiovascular, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0000-1082-8408
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Project 202201020318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is a hypertensive heart disease that significantly escalates the risk of clinical cardiovascular events. Its etiology potentially incorporates various clinical attributes such as gender, age, and renal function. From mechanistic perspective, the remodeling process of LVH can trigger increment in certain biomarkers, notably sST2 and NT-proBNP. This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to construct an LVH risk assessment model and identify the risk factors. A total of 417 patients with essential hypertension (EH), including 214 males and 203 females aged 31-80 years, were enrolled in this study; of these, 161 (38.6%) were diagnosed with LVH. Based on variables demonstrating significant disparities between the LVH and Non-LVH groups, three multivariate stepwise logistic regression models were constructed for risk assessment: the "Clinical characteristics" model, the "Biomarkers" model (each based on their respective variables), and the "Clinical characteristics + Biomarkers" model, which amalgamated both sets of variables. The results revealed that the "Clinical characteristics + Biomarkers" model surpassed the baseline models in performance (AUC values of the "Clinical characteristics + Biomarkers" model, the "Biomarkers" model, and the "Clinical characteristics" model were .83, .75, and .74, respectively; P < .0001 for both comparisons). The optimized model suggested that being female (OR: 4.26, P <.001), being overweight (OR: 1.88, p = .02) or obese (OR: 2.36, p = .02), duration of hypertension (OR: 1.04, P = .04), grade III hypertension (OR: 2.12, P < .001), and sST2 (log-transformed, OR: 1.14, P < .001) were risk factors, while eGFR acted as a protective factor (OR: .98, P = .01). These findings suggest that the integration of clinical characteristics and biomarkers can enhance the performance of LVH risk assessment.

Indexed as

HypertensionHypertrophy, Left VentricularAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersEssential HypertensionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentBiomarkersbiomarkerclinical characteristicsessential hypertensionleft ventricular hypertrophysoluble ST2

Identifiers

PMID38430459
PMCPMC11007794
OpenAlexW4392348259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.