ArticleIrish journal of medical science2024
Can you name that tablet? A cross-sectional study on recognition of common urology medications.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionClinicians frequently rely on patients to accurately tell them what prescription medications and doses they are taking in outpatient visits. This information is essential to monitor the efficacy of a medication and to determine any adverse interactions. This study aimed to assess urologist and urology trainee's visual recognition of common urology medications.
methodsAn online survey was distributed to urologists and urology trainees in Ireland. Images of 11 commonly prescribed urological medications were presented with free text options for answering. Information was gathered on respondent's role and experience. Data was analysed using STATA version 17.
resultsThe survey had a 90% response rate from 50 distributions. Respondents' roles were consultant (31.1%), specialist registrar (33.3%), registrar (22.2%), senior house officer (11.1%) and intern (2.2%). Forty six percent had more than six years urology experience. Average rate of correct responses was 39.4% ± 23.9. The most accurate group were consultants (46.1% ± 22.1), followed by specialist registrars (41.2% ± 24.9), registrars (39.1% ± 26.8), senior house officers (21.8% ± 10.4) and interns (9.1% ± 0). The most and least recognised medications were sildenafil (Viagra
conclusionPatients often do not reliably know their own medications other than to describe them or show an unpackaged tablet. Prescribing safety is paramount to ensuring patient safety and reducing the risk of adverse drug reactions. This study shows that even experienced clinicians do not recognise the medications they regularly prescribe, and decisions should not be made without accurate medication reconciliation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38430412What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.