Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38430356›Full record

ArticleCarbon balance and management2024

Quantifying the impact of key factors on the carbon mitigation potential of managed temperate forests.

Konstantin Gregor, Andreas Krause, Christopher P O Reyer, Thomas Knoke, Benjamin F Meyer, Susanne Suvanto, Anja Rammig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carbon balance and management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Konstantin GregorTUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. konstantin.gregor@tum.de.
Andreas KrauseTUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Christopher P O ReyerPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Member of the Leibniz Association, Potsdam, Germany.
Thomas KnokeTUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Benjamin F MeyerTUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Susanne SuvantoNatural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland.
Anja RammigTUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.

Funding

Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts in the context of the Bavarian Climate Research Network (bayklif) 7831-26625-2017Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 895158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundForests mitigate climate change by reducing atmospheric

resultsOur simulations showed higher mitigation potentials of young forests compared to mature forests, and similar ones in broad-leaved and needle-leaved forests. Long-lived wood products significantly contributed to mitigation, particularly in needle-leaved forests due to their wood product portfolio, and increased material usage of wood showed considerable climate benefits. Consequently, the ongoing conversion of needle-leaved to more broad-leaved forests should be accompanied by the promotion of long-lived products from broad-leaved species to maintain the product sink. Climate change (especially increasing disturbances) and decarbonization were among the most critical factors influencing mitigation potentials and introduced substantial uncertainty. Nevertheless, until 2050 this uncertainty was narrow enough to derive robust findings. For instance, reducing harvest intensities enhanced the carbon sink in our simulations, but diminished substitution effects, leading to a decreased total mitigation potential until 2050. However, when considering longer time horizons (i.e. until 2100), substitution effects became low enough in our simulations due to expected decarbonization such that decreasing harvests often seemed the more favorable solution.

conclusionOur results underscore the need to tailor mitigation strategies to the specific conditions of different forest sites. Furthermore, considering substitution effects, and thoroughly assessing the amount of avoided emissions by using wood products, is critical to determine mitigation potentials. While short-term recommendations are possible, we suggest risk diversification and methodologies like robust optimization to address increasing uncertainties from climate change and decarbonization paces past 2050. Finally, curbing emissions reduces the threat of climate change on forests, safeguarding their carbon sink and ecosystem services.

Indexed as

Carbon mitigationClimate changeDecarbonizationDisplacement factorDisturbanceForestSalvage loggingSubstitution effectWood usage

Identifiers

PMID38430356
PMCPMC11342660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.