Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38430312›Full record

SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2024

The role of endoscopic endonasal salvage surgery in recurrent or residual craniopharyngioma after a transcranial approach: a systematic review.

Gurkirat Kohli, Phabinly J Gabriel, Melanie Brady, Christina H Fang, Jean Anderson Eloy, James K Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gurkirat KohliDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
Phabinly J GabrielDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Melanie BradyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
Christina H FangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jean Anderson EloyDepartments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Neurological Surgery, And Ophthalmology and Visual Science Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
James K LiuSkull Base Institute of New Jersey, Neurosurgeons of New Jersey, NYU Langone Neurosurgery Network, Livingston, NJ, USA. jliu@neurosurgerynj.com.
Neurological Surgery · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USNeurosurgeons of New Jersey · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of craniopharyngiomas is challenging due to their high rate of recurrence following resection. Excision of recurrent tumors poses further surgical challenges due to loss of arachnoidal planes and adherence to anatomical structures. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) offers a favorable alternative to transcranial approaches for primary craniopharyngiomas. However, the safety and efficacy of EEA for recurrent tumors, specifically after a prior transcranial approach, needs further investigation.

methodsWe performed a systematic review using PubMed to develop a database of cases of recurrent craniopharyngiomas previously treated with a transcranial approach.

resultsFifteen articles were included in this review with a total of 75 cases. There were 50 males and 25 females with a mean age of 38 years (range 2-80). One prior transcranial surgery was done in 80.0% of cases, while 8.0% had two and 12.0% had more than two prior surgeries. Radiotherapy after transcranial resection was given in 18 cases (24.0%). Following EEA, vision improved in 60.0% of cases, and vision worsened in 8.6% of the cases. Of cases, 64.4% had pre-existing anterior hypopituitarism, and 43.8% had diabetes insipidus prior to EEA. New anterior hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus developed in 24.6% and 21.9% of cases, respectively following EEA. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 64.0%, subtotal resection in 32.0%, and partial resection in 4.0% revision EEA cases. GTR rate was higher in cases with no prior radiotherapy compared to cases with prior radiotherapy (72.0% vs 39.0%, p = 0.0372). The recurrence rate was 17.5% overall but was significantly lower at 10.0% following GTR (p = 0.0019). The average follow-up length was 41.2 months (range, 1-182 months).

conclusionThe EEA can be utilized for resection of recurrent or residual craniopharyngiomas previously managed by a transcranial approach.

Indexed as

CraniopharyngiomaDiabetes InsipidusHypopituitarismPituitary NeoplasmsEndoscopyHumansCraniopharyngiomaEndoscopic endonasal approachOutcomeTranscranial

Identifiers

PMID38430312
OpenAlexW4392345929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.