Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38430238›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024

Two-Year Preclinical Evaluation of Long-Term Absorbable Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate Scaffold for Surgical Correction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Zeliha Guler, Lisa Ann Kaestner, Eva Vodegel, Lamees Ras, Stephen Jeffrey, Jan Paul Roovers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zeliha GulerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC - location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. zeliha.guler@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7293-8151
Lisa Ann KaestnerDepartment of Urology, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Eva VodegelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC - location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lamees RasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Stephen JeffreyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jan Paul RooversDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC - location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Cape Town · ZAAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisFully absorbable implants may be an alternative to permanent meshes in the correction pf pelvic organ prolapse (POP) as they may reduce adverse events by promoting tissue regeneration and collagen metabolism. This study was aimed at evaluating the long-term host and biomechanical response to a fully absorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in comparison with polypropylene (PP) mesh.

methodsPoly-4-hydroxybutyrate scaffold (n = 16) and PP mesh (n = 16) were surgically implanted in the posterior vaginal wall of parous female Dohne Merino sheep. Vaginal explants were evaluated in terms of gross necropsy, host response (immune response, collagen deposition, tissue regeneration), biomechanics, and degradation of P4HB at 12 and 24 months post-implantation.

resultsGross necropsy revealed no infection or fluid collection using P4HB or PP. At 12 months, exposures were observed with both P4HB (3 out of 8) and PP (4 out of 8), whereas at 24 months, exposures were observed only with PP (4 out of 8). The tensile stiffness of the P4HB explants was maintained over time despite complete absorption of P4HB. The collagen amount of the vaginal tissue after P4HB implantation increased over time and was significantly higher than PP at 24 months. P4HB scaffolds exhibited significantly lower myofibroblast differentiation than PP meshes at 24 months.

conclusionsThe P4HB scaffold allowed for gradual load transfer to the vaginal wall and resulted in mechanically self-sufficient tissue. P4HB scaffold had a more favorable host response than PP mesh, with higher collagen content, lower myofibroblastic differentiation, and no exposures at 24 months. P4HB scaffolds have potential as an alternative to permanent implants in treating POP.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseAbsorbable ImplantsCollagenFemaleHumansSurgical MeshVaginaWound HealingCollagenAbsorbable scaffoldBiomechanicsLong-term host responsePelvic organ prolapsePoly-4-hydroxybutyrateVaginal surgery

Identifiers

PMID38430238
PMCPMC11024044
OpenAlexW4392348853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.