Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38430211›Full record

ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2024

Microphysiological Blood-Brain Barrier Systems for Disease Modeling and Drug Development.

Atharva R Mulay, Jihyun Hwang, Deok-Ho Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Microphysiological systems to advance human pathophysiology and translational medicine.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Atharva R MulayDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Jihyun HwangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-9207-8100
Deok-Ho KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6989-6074

Funding

Microphysiological Model of Human Cardiac Sympathetic InnervationR01HL164936 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, DEOK-HO, KWON, CHULAN · 2022 to 2025
$3.2M
High-throughput neurovascular-unit-on-a-chip with OASIS for modeling Parkinson's diseaseR01NS133965 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Deok-Ho Kim, Gabsang Lee · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
TISSUE ENGINEERED HUMAN NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTIONS FOR MODELING AXONAL NEUROPATHYR01NS094388 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KIM, DEOK-HO · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Tissue-Engineered Models of Lymphatic Drainage in Breast CancerR01CA279560 · NCI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Esak Lee · 2023 to 2026
$1.6M
High-throughput nanoIEA-based Assay for Screening Immune Cell-Vascular InteractionsR21AI168886 · NIAID · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, DEOK-HO, LEE, ESAK · 2023 to 2024
$450k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA279560NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL164936NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI168886NIH HHS R01HL164936NIH HHS R01NS094388NIH HHS R01NS133965NIH HHS R21AI168886NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094388NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS133965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a highly controlled microenvironment that regulates the interactions between cerebral blood and brain tissue. Due to its selectivity, many therapeutics targeting various neurological disorders are not able to penetrate into brain tissue. Pre-clinical studies using animals and other in vitro platforms have not shown the ability to fully replicate the human BBB leading to the failure of a majority of therapeutics in clinical trials. However, recent innovations in vitro and ex vivo modeling called organs-on-chips have shown the potential to create more accurate disease models for improved drug development. These microfluidic platforms induce physiological stressors on cultured cells and are able to generate more physiologically accurate BBBs compared to previous in vitro models. In this review, different approaches to create BBBs-on-chips are explored alongside their application in modeling various neurological disorders and potential therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, organs-on-chips use in BBB drug delivery studies is discussed, and advances in linking brain organs-on-chips onto multiorgan platforms to mimic organ crosstalk are reviewed.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierDrug DevelopmentAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesModels, Biologicalblood‐brain barrierdrug developmentmultiorgan‐on‐a‐chipneurological disordersorgan‐on‐a‐chippre‐clinical studies

Identifiers

PMID38430211
PMCPMC11338747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.