ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2024
To evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in open cardiac surgeries approached through midline sternotomy.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06608290 (Association Between the Application of Parasternal Blockade and Serum Lactate Level in Trans and Post-anesthetic Stages in Cardiac Surgery.), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Association Between the Application of Parasternal Blockade and Serum Lactate Level in Trans and Post-anesthetic Stages in Cardiac Surgery.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Superficial Parasternial Intercostal Plane Block on Postoperative Stress and Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Median Sternotomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- A comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and epidural anesthesia for postoperative recovery in elderly individuals following laparoscopic gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Comparison of thoracic epidural anesthesia with an erector spinae plane infusion for post-esophagectomy analgesia: a pragmatic retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Anatomical landmark-guided compartment block in pediatric lateral thoracotomy: implications for the vertebral arch surface.JA clinical reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block in mitigating postoperative pain has been shown for a range of thoracic and abdominal procedures. However, there is a paucity of literature investigating its impact on postoperative analgesia as well as its influence on weaning and subsequent recovery in comparison to thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in median sternotomy-based approach for open-cardiac surgeries and hence the study.
methodsIrrespective of gender or age, 74 adult patients scheduled to undergo open cardiac surgery were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: the Group TEA (thoracic epidural block) and the Group ESP (bilateral Erector Spinae Plane block). The following variables were analysed prospectively and compared among the groups with regard to pain control, as determined by the VAS Scale both at rest (VAS
resultsClinical and demographic variables were similar in both groups. Both groups had overall good pain control, as determined by the VAS scale both at rest (VAS
conclusionsThe ESP block has been found to have optimal analgesic effects during open cardiac surgery, resulting in a decreased need for additional analgesic doses and eliminating the possibility of a coagulation emergency. Consequently, it presents itself as a safer alternative to the potentially invasive thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.