ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024
Deep learning-based metastasis detection in patients with lung cancer to enhance reproducibility and reduce workload in brain metastasis screening with MRI: a multi-center study.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced prognostic score for breast cancer brain metastases incorporating contemporary clinical features and leptomeningeal disease: Development and validation.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Report-Level Impact of DL Assistance on Teleradiology Quality Support for Brain Metastases: Real-World Clinical Practice at a Single Tertiary Center.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of serum and tissue proteomic profiles in non-small cell lung cancer patients with or without brain metastasis.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of an abbreviated MRI protocol in the screening for brain metastases in the initial staging of lung cancer.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Research progress in artificial intelligence for brain metastases.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess whether a deep learning-based system (DLS) with black-blood imaging for brain metastasis (BM) improves the diagnostic workflow in a multi-center setting. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, a DLS was developed in 101 patients and validated on 264 consecutive patients (with lung cancer) having newly developed BM from two tertiary university hospitals, which performed black-blood imaging between January 2020 and April 2021. Four neuroradiologists independently evaluated BM either with segmented masks and BM counts provided (with DLS) or not provided (without DLS) on a clinical trial imaging management system (CTIMS). To assess reading reproducibility, BM count agreement between the readers and the reference standard were calculated using limits of agreement (LoA). Readers' workload was assessed with reading time, which was automatically measured on CTIMS, and were compared between with and without DLS using linear mixed models considering the imaging center.
resultsIn the validation cohort, the detection sensitivity and positive predictive value of the DLS were 90.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.1-92.2) and 88.2% (95% CI: 85.7-90.4), respectively. The difference between the readers and the reference counts was larger without DLS (LoA: -0.281, 95% CI: -2.888, 2.325) than with DLS (LoA: -0.163, 95% CI: -2.692, 2.367). The reading time was reduced from mean 66.9 s (interquartile range: 43.2-90.6) to 57.3 s (interquartile range: 33.6-81.0) (P <.001) in the with DLS group, regardless of the imaging center.
conclusionDeep learning-based BM detection and counting with black-blood imaging improved reproducibility and reduced reading time, on multi-center validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.