Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429839›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2024

"Maze Out": a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial using a mix methods approach exploring the potential and examining the effectiveness of a serious game in the treatment of eating disorders.

Maria Mercedes Guala, Aida Bikic, Kim Bul, David Clinton, Anna Mejldal, Helene Nygaard Nielsen, Elsebeth Stenager, Anette Søgaard Nielsen

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05621018 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of "Maze Out"), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05621018 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Trial of "Maze Out": A Serious Game to Improve Self-efficacy, Mutual Understanding and Improved Family Functioning in People With Eating Disorders.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2022 to 2024Enrolled143ConditionsEating DisordersArmsMaze Out
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria Mercedes GualaPsychiatric Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 18, 5000, Odense, Denmark. mguala@health.sdu.dk.
Aida BikicDepartment of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Kim BulCentre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
David ClintonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (MEB), Centre for Eating Disorders Innovation (CEDI), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna MejldalPsychiatric Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 18, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Helene Nygaard NielsenPsychiatric Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 18, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
Elsebeth StenagerDepartment of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Anette Søgaard NielsenPsychiatric Research Unit, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 18, 5000, Odense, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKIntelligent Health (United Kingdom) · GBKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Helsefonden 21-B-0130Psychiatric Research Foundation, Region of Southern Denmark 18081155-ITrygFonden 154851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEating Disorders (ED) are severe and costly mental health disorders. The effects of existing treatment approaches are limited and there is a need to develop novel interventions, including digital strategies that can increase engagement and effectiveness. Maze Out is a new serious game coproduced by patients and ED therapists, which allows patients to "play" with the reality of an ED and reflect on associated challenges.

objectivesThe present study has two main objectives: (1) to evaluate the effectiveness of adding Maze Out to treatment as usual (TAU) in a randomised controlled trial (RCT); and (2) to examine in depth the potential of Maze Out by examining how it is perceived and used in the context of an RCT.

methodsParticipants will be recruited from mental health care services, endocrinology departments or Community Centres offering treatment for ED. Patients suffering from ED (N = 94) will be randomised to either TAU or TAU plus Maze Out. Primary outcome will be measured in terms of changes in self-efficacy, measured by a 5-item self-efficacy questionnaire (5-item SE_ED). Secondary outcome measures will include feelings of ineffectiveness and self-image, as measured by Eating Disorder Inventory, version 3 (EDI-3), Brief INSPIRE-O and Structural Analysis of Social Behaviour Intrex Questionnaire (SAS-B). Data will be collected at baseline (enrolment in the study), and subsequently 8 and 15 weeks after inclusion. Experiences of playing Maze Out will be examined in a sub-sample of participants, utilising both quantitative user analytics and qualitative interview data of patients, interview data of significant others, and healthcare professionals to explore the possible impact of Maze Out on disorder insight, communication patterns between patients and therapists and understanding of their disorder. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge Maze Out is the first serious game coproduced by patients and therapists. It is a novel and theoretically grounded intervention that may significantly contribute to the healing process of ED. If found effective, the potential for wide-spread impact and scalability is considerable. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05621018.

Indexed as

Co-productionEating disordersRandomised controlled trialSelf-efficacySerious games

Identifiers

PMID38429839
PMCPMC10908122
OpenAlexW4392359645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.