Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429814›Full record

Observational studyBMC psychology2024

Psychological profile of Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients during the Omicron pandemic in 2022.

Jin Qiu, Chunyan Zhang, Jingyuan Xie, Shan Lin, Hong Ren, Xiaomin Huang, Tian Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jin Qiu *Department of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chunyan Zhang *Department of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jingyuan XieDepartment of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shan LinDepartment of Nephrology, Shanghai TCM-Integrated Hospital, Shanghai University of Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hong RenDepartment of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiaomin HuangDepartment of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. mini_xiaomin@163.com.
Tian XuDepartment of Nephrology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. minson_xu@126.com.
Ruijin Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai University · CN

Funding

China Hospital Association, Blood Purification Center CHABP2021-03Hospital youth personnel training program RCPY0047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the psychological status of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients who were blocked during the 2022 Omic Pandemic in Shanghai.

methodsThis was an observational and cross-sectional study. We selected 172 PD patients from the peritoneal dialysis center of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, during the quarantine of the Omicron pandemic in Shanghai from April to May 2022. General data and biochemical indices were collected. The Kidney Disease Quality of Life (SF-36) questionnaire was used to evaluate the psychological state of the patients during the quarantine.

resultsAccording to the assessment of the SF-36 scale, the physiological and psychological health status of PD patients was better than that before quarantine (P < 0.05). According to the comparison of biochemical indices, the high-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol and body mass index (BMI) levels were lower in patients after quarantine than before quarantine, while the blood phosphorus, blood calcium and haemoglobin levels were greater after quarantine (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that health changes were positively correlated with age of penetration (years) (OR = 1.031, 95% CI = 1.005-1.058); however, physiological function was negatively correlated with sex (OR = 0.198, 95% CI = 0.044-0.899). Energy was significantly positively correlated with closed-loop time (OR = 1.063, 95% CI = 1.001-1.128) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in biochemical indices or quality of life between APD patients and non-APD patients (P > 0.05). According to the results of the abstract independent sample T test, when comparing the various dimensions of the SF-36 scale, for the dimensions of physiological function, pain and energy, the PD patients were better than the HD patients were (P < 0.05). Similarly, for the dimension of physiological function, the HD patients were better than the PD patients were (P < 0.05). During the quarantine period from April to May in Shanghai, the infection rate of PD patients was lower than usual (P < 0.05).

conclusionsDuring the Omicron pandemic in Shanghai in 2022, PD patients exhibited relatively stable psychological and physiological states and a low infection rate. Compared with HD patients, PD patients had better adaptability. Especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, peritoneal dialysis has more advantages.

Indexed as

PandemicsPeritoneal DialysisChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansQuality of LifeOmicronPeritoneal dialysisPsychological status

Identifiers

PMID38429814
PMCPMC10908154
OpenAlexW4392387697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.