ArticleBMC genomics2024
Characterization and mitigation of artifacts derived from NGS library preparation due to structure-specific sequences in the human genome.
Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Distinct 5' and 3' coverage biases shape transcriptome interpretation in Nanopore direct RNA versus PCR-cDNA sequencing.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Clinical decisions in clonal hematopoiesis: a contemporary review for clinicians.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Cancer-Like Fragmentomic Characteristics of Somatic Variants in Cell-Free DNA.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Tutorial for variant interrogation in tumor samples.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- 96 sample parallel acoustic fragmentation for high throughput next generation sequencing library preparation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Spotlight on the Artifacts in Next-Generation Sequencing in PGT-A: Reason for High Mosaicism Reporting.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHybridization capture-based targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) is gaining importance in routine cancer clinical practice. DNA library preparation is a fundamental step to produce high-quality sequencing data. Numerous unexpected, low variant allele frequency calls were observed in libraries using sonication fragmentation and enzymatic fragmentation. In this study, we investigated the characteristics of the artifact reads induced by sonication and enzymatic fragmentation. We also developed a bioinformatic algorithm to filter these sequencing errors.
resultsWe used pairwise comparisons of somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions and deletions (indels) of the same tumor DNA samples prepared using both ultrasonic and enzymatic fragmentation protocols. Our analysis revealed that the number of artifact variants was significantly greater in the samples generated using enzymatic fragmentation than using sonication. Most of the artifacts derived from the sonication-treated libraries were chimeric artifact reads containing both cis- and trans-inverted repeat sequences of the genomic DNA. In contrast, chimeric artifact reads of endonuclease-treated libraries contained palindromic sequences with mismatched bases. Based on these distinctive features, we proposed a mechanistic hypothesis model, PDSM (pairing of partial single strands derived from a similar molecule), by which these sequencing errors derive from ultrasonication and enzymatic fragmentation library preparation. We developed a bioinformatic algorithm to generate a custom mutation "blacklist" in the BED region to reduce errors in downstream analyses.
conclusionsWe first proposed a mechanistic hypothesis model (PDSM) of sequencing errors caused by specific structures of inverted repeat sequences and palindromic sequences in the natural genome. This new hypothesis predicts the existence of chimeric reads that could not be explained by previous models, and provides a new direction for further improving NGS analysis accuracy. A bioinformatic algorithm, ArtifactsFinder, was developed and used to reduce the sequencing errors in libraries produced using sonication and enzymatic fragmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.