ArticleThrombosis journal2024
Clot time ratio (CTR) and relation to treatment outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with Rivaroxaban.
Article in Thrombosis journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are situations where information about the anticoagulant effects of Rivaroxaban could be clinically useful. Methods for measuring Rivaroxaban concentrations are not available at all medical laboratories while the test MRX PT DOAC for measuring the functional effects of Rivaroxaban, in CTR (Clot Time Ratio), can be made available around the clock. The objectives of this study were to investigate CTR in trough and peak samples during Rivaroxaban treatment of atrial fibrillation and to correlate the findings to bleeding episodes.
methods3 trough- and 3 peak samples from 60 patients (30 on 20 mg daily and 30 on 15 mg daily) were analyzed with PT DOAC. Patients were monitored for 20 months, and bleeding and thrombotic events were documented. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and non-parametric t-test for comparison between groups. ROC curves for the prediction of DOAC plasma levels > 50 ng/mL as determined with LC-MS/MS and anti-FXa methods were computed.
resultsThere was a significant difference between trough and peak CTR (median CTR 1.33 vs. 3.57, p < 0.001). 28 patients suffered bleeds. Patients on 20 mg Rivaroxaban with bleeds had higher mean peak CTR than patients without bleeds (CTR 4.11 vs. CTR 3.47, p = 0.040). There was no significant difference in mean CTR between patients on 15 mg Rivaroxaban with or without bleeds (CTR 3.81 vs. 3.21, p = 0.803), or when considering all patients (CTR 3.63 vs. 3.56, p = 0.445). Five out of seven patients on Rivaroxaban 20 with mean peak CTR above the dose specific first to third quartile range (Q1-Q3) suffered bleeds, while 7/16 patients with mean peak CTR within, and 1/7 patients with mean peak CTR below the Q1-Q3 suffered bleeds. The area under the ROC curve was > 0.98 at the upper limit of the PT DOAC reference interval and the negative predictive value of PT DOAC for the prediction of DOAC plasma levels > 50 ng/mL was > 0.96.
conclusionsThe sample size was too low to draw any firm conclusions but is seems that MRX PT DOAC might be a useful laboratory test in situations where the effect of Rivaroxaban needs evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.