Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429688›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Contextualizing medications for opioid use disorder and peer support service provision in the probation system with implementation science.

Augustine W Kang, Amelia Bailey, Siena Napoleon, Rosemarie Martin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Augustine W KangCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main St, Box G-121-5, Providence, RI, USA. Augustine_kang@brown.edu.
Amelia BaileyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main St, Box G-121-5, Providence, RI, USA.
Siena NapoleonCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main St, Box G-121-5, Providence, RI, USA.
Rosemarie MartinCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S. Main St, Box G-121-5, Providence, RI, USA.
Brown University · USStanford University · US

Funding

Using Implementation Interventions and Peer Recovery Support to Improve Opioid Treatment Outcomes in Community SupervisionU01DA050442 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BRINKLEY-RUBINSTEIN, LAUREN, MARTIN, ROSEMARIE A · 2019 to 2024
$12.6M
Substance Abuse Intervention/Outcome Research TrainingT32DA016184 · NIDA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI Damaris J. Rohsenow, JENNIFER W. TIDEY · 2003 to 2026
$6.1M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016184NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA050442NIH HHS U01 DA050442-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is an evidence-based approach that reduces opioid-related mortality, particularly among criminal legal-involved persons who are at increased risk of adverse outcomes related to OUD. Implementing evidence-based approaches in the context of probation settings requires an in-depth understanding of specific contexts to improve intervention efficacy and effectiveness. Here, we use the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework to understand implementation contexts for MOUD provision in the probation setting.

methodsIn-depth individual interviews were conducted with key programmatic stakeholders (treatment providers and probation staff involved in service provision for people on probation). The study examined stakeholder perspectives regarding MOUD and Peer Support Service (PSS) implementation among people who are involved in community supervision. Deductive and inductive thematic analysis was conducted, and subsequently the codes, subcodes, and themes were mapped onto the EPIS framework to better understand implementation contexts.

resultsWe deduced key inner, outer, and bridging contexts that shape treatment service provision for individuals with OUD who are on probation. Inner contexts include a strong organizational climate that supports MOUD implementation and enthusiasm for peer support services. Outer contexts include difficulty navigating insurance among providers, treatment costs, and systemic stigma towards MOUD. Bridging contexts include a lack of collaboration/communication between relevant agencies (e.g., probation and courts).

conclusionsFindings indicate the implementation is complex and requires a coordinated effort between correctional systems, probation agencies, and community-based treatment providers.

Indexed as

CriminalsOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidCommunicationHumansImplementation ScienceAnalgesics, OpioidImplementation scienceOpioid Use disordersPeer supportTreatment provision

Identifiers

PMID38429688
PMCPMC10905868
OpenAlexW4392385551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.