ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
Biophysical and functional characterization of N-terminal domain of Human Interferon Regulatory Factor 6.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) has a key function in palate fusion during palatogenesis during embryonic development, and mutations in IRF6 cause orofacial clefting disorders. METHODS AND
resultsThe in silico analysis of IRF6 is done to obtain leads for the domain boundaries and subsequently the sub-cloning of the N-terminal domain of IRF6 into the pGEX-2TK expression vector and successfully optimized the overexpression and purification of recombinant glutathione S-transferase-fused NTD-IRF6 protein under native conditions. After cleavage of the GST tag, NTD-IRF6 was subjected to protein folding studies employing Circular Dichroism and Intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy at variable pH, temperature, and denaturant. CD studies showed predominantly alpha-helical content and the highest stability of NTD-IRF6 at pH 9.0. A comparison of native and renatured protein depicts loss in the secondary structural content. Intrinsic fluorescence and quenching studies have identified that tryptophan residues are majorly present in the buried areas of the protein and a small fraction was on or near the protein surface. Upon the protein unfolding with a higher concentration of denaturant urea, the peak of fluorescence intensity decreased and red shifted, confirming that tryptophan residues are majorly present in a more polar environment. While regulating IFN
conclusionNTD-IRF6 consists of a mix of α-helix and β-sheets that show temperature-dependent cooperative unfolding between 40 °C and 55 °C. Urea-induced unfolding shows moderate tolerance to urea as the mid-transition concentration of urea (Cm) is 3.2 M. The tryptophan residues are majorly buried as depicted by fluorescence quenching studies. NTD-IRF6 has a specific and high affinity toward the promoter region of VRE-IFN
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.