Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429559›Full record

SynthesisJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

A Systematic Review on Caries Detection, Classification, and Segmentation from X-Ray Images: Methods, Datasets, Evaluation, and Open Opportunities.

Luiz Guilherme Kasputis Zanini, Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen, Fátima de Lourdes Dos Santos Nunes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luiz Guilherme Kasputis ZaniniDepartment of Computer Engineering and Digital Systems, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto 158, São Paulo, 05508-010, São Paulo, Brazil. luiz.kasputis@usp.br.ORCID 0000-0002-8344-3178
Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen *School of Dentistry at Bauru, University of São Paulo, Alameda Doutor Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla, Bauru, 17012-191, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5069-9433
Fátima de Lourdes Dos Santos Nunes *Department of Computer Engineering and Digital Systems, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto 158, São Paulo, 05508-010, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0040-0752

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 307710/2022-0Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Medicina Assistida por Computação Científica 2014/50889-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental caries occurs from the interaction between oral bacteria and sugars, generating acids that damage teeth over time. The importance of X-ray images for detecting oral problems is undeniable in dentistry. With technological advances, it is feasible to identify these lesions using techniques such as deep learning, machine learning, and image processing. Therefore, the survey and systematization of these methods are essential to determining the main computational approaches for identifying caries in X-ray images. In this systematic review, we investigated the primary computational methods used for classifying, detecting, and segmenting caries in X-ray images. Following the PRISMA methodology, we selected relevant studies and analyzed their methods, strengths, limitations, imaging modalities, evaluation metrics, datasets, and classification techniques. The review encompassed 42 studies retrieved from the Science Direct, IEEExplore, ACM Digital, and PubMed databases from the Computer Science and Health areas. The results indicate that 12% of the included articles utilized public datasets, with deep learning being the predominant approach, accounting for 69% of the studies. The majority of these studies (76%) focused on classifying dental caries, either in binary or multiclass classification. Panoramic imaging was the most commonly used radiographic modality, representing 29% of the cases studied. Overall, our systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the computational methods employed in identifying caries in radiographic images and highlights trends, patterns, and challenges in this research field.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningCariesCavitiesDeep learningDental cariesImage processingMachine learningRadiographySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38429559
PMCPMC11300762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.