ArticleCommunications biology2024
Digital RNA sequencing using unique molecular identifiers enables ultrasensitive RNA mutation analysis.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Salt-Tolerant Germplasm and Salt-Responsive Genes inAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Early Cancer Detection: What's Going on and What's Next.MedComm · 2026Review
- ERMP1 Exerts Tumor-Suppressive Functions in KIRC by Inhibiting PI3K/AKT Signaling and Remodeling the Immune Microenvironment: A Pan-Cancer Analysis.Human mutation · 2026Article
- Digital sequencing is improved by using structured unique molecular identifiers.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mutation analysis is typically performed at the DNA level since most technical approaches are developed for DNA analysis. However, some applications, like transcriptional mutagenesis, RNA editing and gene expression analysis, require RNA analysis. Here, we combine reverse transcription and digital DNA sequencing to enable low error digital RNA sequencing. We evaluate yield, reproducibility, dynamic range and error correction rate for seven different reverse transcription conditions using multiplexed assays. The yield, reproducibility and error rate vary substantially between the specific conditions, where the yield differs 9.9-fold between the best and worst performing condition. Next, we show that error rates similar to DNA sequencing can be achieved for RNA using appropriate reverse transcription conditions, enabling detection of mutant allele frequencies <0.1% at RNA level. We also detect mutations at both DNA and RNA levels in tumor tissue using a breast cancer panel. Finally, we demonstrate that digital RNA sequencing can be applied to liquid biopsies, analyzing cell-free gene transcripts. In conclusion, we demonstrate that digital RNA sequencing is suitable for ultrasensitive RNA mutation analysis, enabling several basic research and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.