Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429503›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2025

Imaging of aqueous outflow in health and glaucoma. Justifying the re-direction of aqueous.

Jed A Lusthaus

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jed A LusthausDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sydney Eye Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. jed.lusthaus@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4111-5408
The University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wave of less invasive surgical options that target or bypass the conventional aqueous outflow system has been incorporated into routine clinical practice to mitigate surgical risks associated with traditional glaucoma drainage surgery. A blanket surgical approach for open-angle glaucoma is unlikely to achieve the desired IOP reduction in an efficient or economical way. Developing a precise approach to selecting the most appropriate surgical tool for each patient is dependent upon understanding the complexities of the aqueous outflow system and how devices influence aqueous drainage. However, homoeostatic control of aqueous outflow in health and glaucoma remains poorly understood. Emerging imaging techniques have provided an opportunity to study aqueous outflow responses non-invasively in clinic settings. Haemoglobin Video Imaging (HVI) studies have demonstrated different patterns of aqueous outflow within the episcleral venous system in normal and glaucomatous eyes, as well as perioperatively after trabecular bypass surgery. Explanations for aqueous outflow patterns remain speculative until direct correlation with findings from Schlemm's canal and the trabecular meshwork are possible. The redirection of aqueous via targeted stent placement may only be justifiable once the role of the aqueous outflow system in IOP homoeostasis has been defined.

Indexed as

Aqueous HumorGlaucomaGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsDiagnostic ImagingEyeGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureOphthalmologic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID38429503
PMCPMC11885811
OpenAlexW4392387283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.