ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024
Diagnostic value of multi-slice spiral computed tomography angiography for intracranial aneurysm.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the clinical value of multi-slice spiral computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms (ICA).
methodsThe imaging data of 68 patients suspected of having ICA who were examined in the Department of Radiology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from March 2018 to March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. MSCTA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were performed on each patient, and the MSCTA imaging analysis was compared with DSA.
resultsThe accuracy of DSA in the diagnosis of ICA was 98.53% (67/68), while the accuracy of MSCTA in the diagnosis of ICA was 97.06% (66/68), with no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences in the diameter of the aneurysm, the width of the aneurysm neck, or the location of the aneurysm in the comparison of the ICA image between DSA and MSCTA (P > 0.05).
conclusionMSCTA offers high accuracy and has favorable clinical value in the diagnosis of ICA. It is worth popularizing as the recommended examination method in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.