Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429396›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2024

On the value of advanced information about delayed rewards.

Alejandro Macías, Armando Machado, Marco Vasconcelos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alejandro MacíasWilliam James Center for Research, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal. josea.maciasaa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2958-9766
Armando MachadoWilliam James Center for Research, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4380-3711
Marco VasconcelosWilliam James Center for Research, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-0749

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 239027/438354Fulbright Grant for Scholars and Researchers AY2022/2023Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/PSI/01662/2013 and UIDB/04810/2020Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e Ensino INCT-ECCE / CNPq Grant #465686/2014-1),
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a variety of laboratory preparations, several animal species prefer signaled over unsignaled outcomes. Here we examine whether pigeons prefer options that signal the delay to reward over options that do not and how this preference changes with the ratio of the delays. We offered pigeons repeated choices between two alternatives leading to a short or a long delay to reward. For one alternative (informative), the short and long delays were reliably signaled by different stimuli (e.g., S

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorRewardAnimalsColumbidaeDelay to rewardInformation biasInstrumental valuePigeonsΔ–Σ hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID38429396
PMCPMC10907439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.