Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429374›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A real-world analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) events for liposomal and conventional doxorubicins.

Huiling Su, Jing Jia, Yuxiang Mao, Riran Zhu, Zhengjun Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Huiling Su *Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jing Jia *Department of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Yuxiang Mao *Medical School, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Riran ZhuDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Zhengjun LiDepartment of Dermatology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. lzj19861126@163.com.
Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNKunming University of Science and Technology · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022M711909Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation ZR2022MH068Shandong Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation SDCX-ZG-202203066Shandong Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine Technology Project Q-2022066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical application of conventional doxorubicin (CDOX) was constrained by its side effects. Liposomal doxorubicin was developed to mitigate these limitations, showing improved toxicity profiles. However, the adverse events associated with liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX have not yet been comprehensively evaluated in clinical settings. The FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2022 were collected to analyze the adverse events of liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX. Disproportionate analysis and Bayesian analysis were employed to quantify this association. Our analysis incorporated 68,803 adverse event reports related to Doxil/Caelyx, Myocet and CDOX. The relative odds ratios (RORs, 95%CI) for febrile neutropenia associated with CDOX, Doxil/Caelyx, and Myocet were 42.45 (41.44; 43.48), 17.53 (16.02; 19.20), and 34.68 (26.63; 45.15) respectively. For cardiotoxicity, they were 38.87(36.41;41.49), 17.96 (14.10; 22.86), and 37.36 (19.34; 72.17). For Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE), the RORs were 6.16 (5.69; 6.68), 36.13 (32.60; 40.06), and 19.69 (11.59; 33.44). Regarding onset time, significant differences adverse events including neutropenia, PPE, pneumonia and malignant neoplasm progression. This study indicates that clinical monitoring for symptoms of cardiotoxicity of CDOX and Myocet, and PPE and interstitial lung disease of Doxil should be performed. Additionally, the onset time of febrile neutropenia, malignant neoplasm progression, and pneumonia associated with Doxil and Myocet merits particular attention. Continuous surveillance, risk evaluations, and additional comparative studies between liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX were recommended.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNeutropeniaPneumoniaBayes TheoremCardiotoxicityDoxorubicinHumansLiposomesPolyethylene GlycolsDoxorubicinliposomal doxorubicinLiposomesPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID38429374
PMCPMC10907704
OpenAlexW4392355232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.