ArticleScientific reports2024
A real-world analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) events for liposomal and conventional doxorubicins.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gaps in the detection of drug-drug interactions between antipsychotic and cardiometabolic medications: a multisource analysis.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Targeted Strategies for Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: Exploring the Use of Aptamers and Gold Nanoparticles.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deciphering the Formulation-Dependent Neurotoxicity of Irinotecan: An Integrated Pharmacovigilance and Mechanistic Study.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2026Article
- Classic Kaposi Sarcoma: Current Treatment Strategies and Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.Cancers · 2026Review
- Cardiac safety of L-Annamycin: a pooled analysis of five clinical trials.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Nanocarrier-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Lung Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- FAERS based disproportionality analysis and network pharmacology investigation of doxorubicin associated drug induced cardiotoxicity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A real-world pharmacovigilance study of Certolizumab pegol based on FAERS database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- In vitro assessment of nanomedicines' propensity to cause palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia: A Doxil vs. doxorubicin case study.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2024Article
- Enhancing Gentamicin Antibacterial Activity by Co-Encapsulation with Thymoquinone in Liposomal Formulation.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Alternative Strategies for Delivering Immunotherapeutics Targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint in Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Breaking barriers: The potential of nanosystems in antituberculosis therapy.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- [Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical application of conventional doxorubicin (CDOX) was constrained by its side effects. Liposomal doxorubicin was developed to mitigate these limitations, showing improved toxicity profiles. However, the adverse events associated with liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX have not yet been comprehensively evaluated in clinical settings. The FAERS data from January 2004 to December 2022 were collected to analyze the adverse events of liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX. Disproportionate analysis and Bayesian analysis were employed to quantify this association. Our analysis incorporated 68,803 adverse event reports related to Doxil/Caelyx, Myocet and CDOX. The relative odds ratios (RORs, 95%CI) for febrile neutropenia associated with CDOX, Doxil/Caelyx, and Myocet were 42.45 (41.44; 43.48), 17.53 (16.02; 19.20), and 34.68 (26.63; 45.15) respectively. For cardiotoxicity, they were 38.87(36.41;41.49), 17.96 (14.10; 22.86), and 37.36 (19.34; 72.17). For Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysesthesia (PPE), the RORs were 6.16 (5.69; 6.68), 36.13 (32.60; 40.06), and 19.69 (11.59; 33.44). Regarding onset time, significant differences adverse events including neutropenia, PPE, pneumonia and malignant neoplasm progression. This study indicates that clinical monitoring for symptoms of cardiotoxicity of CDOX and Myocet, and PPE and interstitial lung disease of Doxil should be performed. Additionally, the onset time of febrile neutropenia, malignant neoplasm progression, and pneumonia associated with Doxil and Myocet merits particular attention. Continuous surveillance, risk evaluations, and additional comparative studies between liposomal doxorubicin and CDOX were recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.