ArticleScientific reports2024
A novel difficult-to-segment samples focusing network for oral CBCT image segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- LADAS: A Localization-Adaptive Dual-Branch Framework for Accurate Delineation of Teeth and Jaw Bone in Axial CBCT Slices.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Clinically applicable deep learning model for segmentation of the mandibular bone and inferior alveolar canal in CBCT cross-sectional images.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of sandstone microtomographic image segmentation using advanced convolutional neural networks with pixelwise and physical accuracy evaluation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Alveolar Bone Segmentation Methods in Assessing the Effectiveness of Periodontal Defect Regeneration Through Machine Learning of CBCT Data: A Systematic Review.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using deep learning technology to segment oral CBCT images for clinical diagnosis and treatment is one of the important research directions in the field of clinical dentistry. However, the blurred contour and the scale difference limit the segmentation accuracy of the crown edge and the root part of the current methods, making these regions become difficult-to-segment samples in the oral CBCT segmentation task. Aiming at the above problems, this work proposed a Difficult-to-Segment Focus Network (DSFNet) for segmenting oral CBCT images. The network utilizes a Feature Capturing Module (FCM) to efficiently capture local and long-range features, enhancing the feature extraction performance. Additionally, a Multi-Scale Feature Fusion Module (MFFM) is employed to merge multiscale feature information. To further improve the loss ratio for difficult-to-segment samples, a hybrid loss function is proposed, combining Focal Loss and Dice Loss. By utilizing the hybrid loss function, DSFNet achieves 91.85% Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 0.216 mm Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD) performance in oral CBCT segmentation tasks. Experimental results show that the proposed method is superior to current dental CBCT image segmentation techniques and has real-world applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.