Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429337›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Nutrient retention after crop harvest in a typic hapludults amended with biochar types under no-tillage system.

Qamar Sarfaraz, Gerson Laerson Drescher, Mohsin Zafar, Muhammad Nadeem Shah, Fengliang Zhao, Subhan Danish, Abd El-Zaher M A Mustafa, Mohamed S Elshikh, Leandro Souza da Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Qamar SarfarazDepartment of Soil Science, Lasbela University of Agriculture, Water and Marine Sciences, Lasbela, Uthal Balochistan, Pakistan. qschoudhary@gmail.com.
Gerson Laerson DrescherFederal University of Santa Maria, 1000 Roraima Ave, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.
Mohsin ZafarDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Mirpur University of Science and Technology, Mirpur, AJK, Pakistan.
Muhammad Nadeem ShahDepartment of Agriculture, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fengliang ZhaoEnvironment and Plant Protection Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Science, Haikou, China.
Subhan DanishDepartment of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan. sd96850@gmail.com.
Abd El-Zaher M A MustafaDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. 2455, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed S ElshikhDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. 2455, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Leandro Souza da SilvaFederal University of Santa Maria, 1000 Roraima Ave, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.
King Saud University · SABahauddin Zakariya University · PKEnvironment and Plant Protection Research Institute · CNLasbela University of Agriculture Water and Marine Science · PKMirpur University of Science and Technology · PKUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRUniversity of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of biochar's as soil amendments for enhancing nutrient retention in subsoils present potential limitations. To address this issue, we conducted a greenhouse experiment to assess the effects of various biochar's derived from animal manures (swine manure, poultry litter, cattle manure) and plant residues (rice straw, soybean straw, corn straw) when applied to surface of an acidic soil. Our study focused on wheat crops under a no-tillage system, with a subsequent evaluation of the residual impacts on soybeans. The experimental design involved the application of biochar's at different rates i.e. 10 and 20 Mg ha

Indexed as

CharcoalManureAnimalsCattleGlycine maxNutrientsSoilSwinebiocharCharcoalManureNutrientsSoilBiocharExchangeable AlpHPrimary nutrientsStratification

Identifiers

PMID38429337
PMCPMC10907612
OpenAlexW4392386667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.