Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429328›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Evaluating public opinions: informing public health policy adaptations in China amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Chenyang Wang, Xinzhi Wang, Pei Wang, Qing Deng, Yi Liu, Hui Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenyang WangInstitute of Public Safety Research, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, People's Republic of China.
Xinzhi WangSchool of Computer Engineering and Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, People's Republic of China. wxz2017@shu.edu.cn.
Pei WangInstitute of Public Safety Research, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, People's Republic of China.
Qing DengResearch Institute of Macro-Safety Science, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China.
Yi LiuPublic Order School, People's Public Security University of China, Beijing, 100872, People's Republic of China.
Hui ZhangInstitute of Public Safety Research, Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, People's Republic of China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2602401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public concern regarding safety policies serious consequences is anticipated to persist over an extended duration. A study examining a case of rapid public health policy adaptation in China during the COVID-19 epidemic was conducted by gathering public opinion data from major social media platforms. A systematic approach to comprehend public opinion was developed. Five fundamental elements and four dimensions were delineated. An indicator system was established utilizing the K-means text clustering model. Public prediction, expectation, and their evolution underlying public concern were elucidated employing TF-IDF text mining models. The HMM elucidated the way public opinion influences policy adjustments. The findings underscore that public concern regarding enduring events undergoes temporal shifts, mirroring the evolution of public opinion towards policy. Public opinion aroused by both the original event and derived events collaboratively influence policy adjustments. In China, public opinion serves as a mechanism for policy feedback and oversight; notably, negative public sentiment plays a pivotal role in expediting policy transitions. These findings aid in refining policies to mitigate emergencies through a feedback loop, thereby averting the emergence of safety risks such as social unrest prompted by public opinion.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaChinaHealth PolicyHumansPandemicsPublic HealthPublic OpinionPublic PolicyPolicy informaticsPublic healthPublic opinionSocial media

Identifiers

PMID38429328
PMCPMC10907359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.