ArticleScientific reports2024
Development of a deep learning model to distinguish the cause of optic disc atrophy using retinal fundus photography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Ophthalmology for Optic Disc Pathologies and Neurodegenerative Disease.Eye and brain · 2026Review
- Detection of optic disc in human retinal images utilizing the Bitterling Fish Optimization (BFO) algorithm.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The differential diagnosis for optic atrophy can be challenging and requires expensive, time-consuming ancillary testing to determine the cause. While Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) and optic neuritis (ON) are both clinically significant causes for optic atrophy, both relatively rare in the general population, contributing to limitations in obtaining large imaging datasets. This study therefore aims to develop a deep learning (DL) model based on small datasets that could distinguish the cause of optic disc atrophy using only fundus photography. We retrospectively reviewed fundus photographs of 120 normal eyes, 30 eyes (15 patients) with genetically-confirmed LHON, and 30 eyes (26 patients) with ON. Images were split into a training dataset and a test dataset and used for model training with ResNet-18. To visualize the critical regions in retinal photographs that are highly associated with disease prediction, Gradient-Weighted Class Activation Map (Grad-CAM) was used to generate image-level attention heat maps and to enhance the interpretability of the DL system. In the 3-class classification of normal, LHON, and ON, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 1.0 for normal, 0.988 for LHON, and 0.990 for ON, clearly differentiating each class from the others with an overall total accuracy of 0.93. Specifically, when distinguishing between normal and disease cases, the precision, recall, and F1 scores were perfect at 1.0. Furthermore, in the differentiation of LHON from other conditions, ON from others, and between LHON and ON, we consistently observed precision, recall, and F1 scores of 0.8. The model performance was maintained until only 10% of the pixel values of the image, identified as important by Grad-CAM, were preserved and the rest were masked, followed by retraining and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.