Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429168›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2024

Biofilm removal from Difficult-to-Reach places via secondary cavitation within a constrained geometry mimicking a Periodontal/Peri-Implant pocket.

Marko Volk, Katja Molan, Dominik Šavli, Saša Terlep, Špela Levičnik-Höfferle, Boris Gašpirc, Matjaž Lukač, Matija Jezeršek, David Stopar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marko VolkUniversity of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Microbiology, Večna pot 111, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Katja MolanUniversity of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Microbiology, Večna pot 111, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Dominik ŠavliUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Aškerčeva cesta 6, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Saša TerlepFotona d.o.o., Stegne 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Špela Levičnik-HöfferleFotona d.o.o., Stegne 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Boris GašpircUniversity of Ljubljana, Medical Faculty, Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Vrazov trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Matjaž LukačFotona d.o.o., Stegne 7, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia; Institut Jozef Stefan, Jamova 39, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia; University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Jadranska 19, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
Matija JezeršekUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Aškerčeva cesta 6, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
David StoparUniversity of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Microbiology, Večna pot 111, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia. Electronic address: david.stopar@bf.uni-lj.si.
University of Ljubljana · SIFotona (Slovenia) · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm removal from the apical region of the periodontal or peri-implant pocket, which is very difficult to achieve with mechanical instruments, is a major unresolved issue in dentistry. Here, we propose the use of photoacoustically induced streaming and secondary cavitation to achieve superior cleaning efficacy in the apical region of the periodontal and peri-implant pocket. We have used a prefabricated narrow wedge system that mimics the consistency of periodontal and peri-implant pockets of both healthy and severely inflamed tissue. We studied the effect of single-pulse modality Er:YAG on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm removal. We used different laser energies, fiber-tip positions, and laser treatment durations. The cleaning process was monitored in real-time with a high-speed camera after each individual laser pulse application. The obtained results suggest that biofilm cleaning efficacy in a difficult-to-reach place in healthy model tissue is directly related to the onset of secondary cavitation bubble formation, which correlates with a significant improvement of biofilm removal from the apical region of the periodontal or peri-implant pocket. In comparison to the healthy tissue model, the laser energy in inflamed tissue model had to be increased to obtain comparable biofilm cleaning efficacy. The advantage of photoacoustic cavitation compared to other methods is that laser-induced cavitation can trigger secondary cavitation at large distances from the point of laser application, which in principle allows biofilm removal at distant locations not reachable with a laser fiber tip or other mechanical instruments.

Indexed as

BiofilmsProstheses and ImplantsBiofilm removalCavitationEr:YAG USPPeri-implant pocketPeriodontal pocketPhotoacoustic cleaning

Identifiers

PMID38429168
PMCPMC10985801
OpenAlexW4392093906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.