ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2025
Novel and unusual
Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The best solution is the simplest: advances in surgical and minimally invasive management of aneurysmal and simple bone cysts.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- Rethinking the role of bisphosphonates after denosumab treatment in locally advanced or unresectable aneurysmal bone cysts: A meta-analysis.World journal of orthopedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe purpose of this study is to report novel and unusual
methodsA cohort of seven patients diagnosed with ABC examined between 2014 and 2023 at Motol University Hospital in Prague was included into this retrospective non-randomised study. All cases were analysed using histopathological evaluation, immunohistochemistry and Anchored multiplex RNA methods. Demographic characteristics and clinical data were also analysed.
resultsWe identified two novel (
conclusionsCases in our study were diagnosed as ABCs due to characteristic clinical and morphological presentation. However, not all cases are as self-evident, and molecular testing is necessary. The identification of these gene alterations can be useful in distinction between true ABC and ABC-like changes among many benign and malignant bone tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.