ArticleBlood advances2024
It is feasible and safe to stop specialized follow-up of asymptomatic lower-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Single-Center Retrospective Study of the Investigation of Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in Southwestern Ontario: Are We Over-Investigating?International journal of laboratory hematology · 2025Article
- Article
- Ending endless follow-up for low-risk CLL?Blood advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractApproximately half of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) will never require treatment; nonetheless, they are recommended life-long specialized follow-up (sFU). To prioritize health care resources, local hospital management implemented ending sFU in asymptomatic patients with CLL International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) and CLL without need of treatment (CLL-WONT) low-to-intermediate risk, who were covered by universal health care. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of ending sFU, we investigated 3-year clinical outcomes among 112 patients selected by clinical assessment to end sFU as compared with 88 patients selected to continue sFU. Patients who ended sFU were older, but otherwise lower risk compared with patients continuing sFU. Overall survival (OS) was similar in patients ending and continuing sFU (3-year OS, 87% and 80%, respectively; P = .16). Hospital visits per patient-year were lower (median 0.7 vs 4.3, P < .0001) and time to first infection was longer (P = .035) in patients ending sFU compared with those who continued sFU, including shorter in-hospital antimicrobial treatment (median 4 vs 12 days, respectively; P = .026). Finally, 1 in 6 patients were rereferred, including 4 patients meeting international workshop on CLL criteria for need of treatment. This also resulted in a lower 3-year first treatment rate for patients ending sFU compared with patients continuing sFU (4% vs 23%, respectively; P < .0001). In conclusion, it is feasible and safe to end sFU for patients with CLL who have low-to-intermediate risk CLL-IPI and CLL-WONT scores upon thorough clinical evaluation before ending sFU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.