Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429068›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2024

Implementation of value-based healthcare in ophthalmology: a scoping review.

Zulkarnain Abubakar, Amal Chalik Sjaaf, Tjahjono Darminto Gondhowiardjo, Moh Anfasa Giffari Makkaraka

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The VBHC big picture: an umbrella review.BMC health services research · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zulkarnain AbubakarDoctoral Program in Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia zulkarnain.abubakar@ui.ac.id.ORCID 0009-0001-1262-5759
Amal Chalik SjaafDepartment of Administration & Health Policy, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.
Tjahjono Darminto GondhowiardjoJEC Eye Hospitals & Clinics, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Moh Anfasa Giffari MakkarakaHasanuddin University School of Medicine, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-1179-5366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review aimed to identify and summarise how value-based healthcare (VBHC) is implemented in the field of ophthalmology.

methodsA scoping review was conducted by searching empirical and non-empirical articles from from electronic databases (PubMed, Science Direct, ProQuest and Scopus) and other methods starting January 2006 (the year Porter and Teisberg introduced VBHC) up to 31 December 2023.

results1.081 records were screened, and 12 articles (8 empirical studies and 4 non-empirical articles) were used for data extraction. Most articles were published in the UK. Most articles described the implementation of VBHC agenda by measuring outcomes and costs. All the included empirical studies reported implementation effect; otherwise, non-empirical articles were only described proposed implementation.

conclusionThe implementation of VBHC in ophthalmology has shown a positive impact on enhancing patient value and reducing healthcare costs. Nevertheless, the study highlighted that no provider or healthcare system has fully embraced and implemented VBHC, comprehensively addressing the entire value agenda.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyDelivery of Health CareHealth Care CostsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareValue-Based Health CarePublic health

Identifiers

PMID38429068
PMCPMC10910640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.