Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38429063›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2024

Improving inpatient hyperglycaemia in non-critically ill adults in resident wards through audit and feedback.

Chelsea Chang, Alcibiades Fleires, Alfarooq Alshaikhli, Hector Arredondo, Diana Gavilanes, Francisco J Cabral-Amador, Jonathon Cantu, Daniela Bazan, Kathryn Oliveira Oliveira, Rene Verduzco and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chelsea ChangInternal Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Edinburg, Texas, USA chelsea.chang@utrgv.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8309-5911
Alcibiades FleiresInternal Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Alfarooq AlshaikhliInternal Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Hector ArredondoInternal Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Diana GavilanesInternal Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Francisco J Cabral-AmadorInternal Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Jonathon CantuDHR Health, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Daniela BazanDHR Health, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Kathryn Oliveira OliveiraDHR Health, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Rene VerduzcoDHR Health, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
Lina PedrazaInternal Medicine, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine, Edinburg, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley · USDoctors Hospital at Renaissance · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inpatient hyperglycaemia is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality, number of rehospitalisations and length of hospitalisation. Although the advantages of proper glycaemic control in hospitalised patients with diabetes are well established, a variety of barriers limit accomplishment of blood glucose targets. Our primary aim was to decrease the number of glucose values above 180 mg/dL in non-critical care hospitalised patients using an audit and feedback intervention with pharmacy and internal medicine residents. A resident-led multidisciplinary team implemented the quality improvement (QI) project including conception, literature review, educating residents, iterative development of audit and feedback tools and data analysis. The multidisciplinary team met every 5 weeks and undertook three 'plan-do-study-act' cycles over an 8-month intervention period (August 2022 to March 2023) to educate residents on inpatient hyperglycaemia management, develop and implement an audit and feedback process and assess areas for improvement. We performed 1045 audits analysing 16 095 accu-checks on 395 non-duplicated patients. Most audits showed compliance with guidelines. The monthly run-on chart shows per cent of glucose values above 180 mg/dL in our non-ICU hospitalised patients and an overall pre-to-post comparison of 25.1%-23.0% (p value<0.05). The intervention was well accepted by residents evidenced by survey results. We did not meet our primary aim to reduce hyperglycaemia by 30% and this combined with the audits showing mostly compliance with guidelines suggests that prescribing behaviour was not a key driver of inpatient hyperglycaemia in our population. This internal medicine resident and pharmacy interprofessional collaboration with audit and feedback for inpatient hyperglycaemia was feasible, well accepted and had a statistically significant yet small improvement in inpatient hyperglycaemia. The project may be helpful to others wishing to explore inpatient hyperglycaemia, interprofessional QI with pharmacists, resident-led QI and audit and feedback.

Indexed as

HyperglycemiaAdultFeedbackGlucoseHospitalsHumansInpatientsGlucoseAudit and feedbackDiabetes mellitusGraduate medical educationHospital medicinePharmacists

Identifiers

PMID38429063
PMCPMC10910419
OpenAlexW4392360533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.