ArticleEndoscopy2024
Repeat endoscopic intermuscular dissection of the visible scar after noncurative endoscopic intermuscular dissection of a rectal neuroendocrine tumor.
Article in Endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07612748 (Retrospective Comparative Study of Two Different Endoscopic Treatments for Rectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Retrospective Comparative Study of Two Different Endoscopic Treatments for Rectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status of endoscopic resection for small rectal neuroendocrine tumors.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Endoscopic intermuscular dissection for management of 10- to 20-mm rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Pilot study (with video).Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Non-insufflation endoscopic intermuscular dissection in the management of a rectal neuroendocrine tumor.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Efficacy of underwater endoscopic intermuscular dissection in the management of a rectal neuroendocrine tumor.Endoscopy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.