Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38428681›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2024

A Phase 1 Trial of Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer After Brachytherapy.

Krishnan R Patel, Nicholas R Rydzewski, Erica Schott, Theresa Cooley-Zgela, Holly Ning, Jason Cheng, Kilian Salerno, Erich P Huang, Liza Lindenberg, Esther Mena and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03253744 (Phase I Trial of Image Guided Focally Dose Escalated Prostate SBRT for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Prior Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03253744 phase1completednot on this map

Phase I Trial of Image Guided Focally Dose Escalated Prostate SBRT for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Prior Radiotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2018 to 2025Enrolled17ConditionsProstate Cancer, Prostatic NeoplasmArms18F-DCFPyL, Tumor Irradiation, Prostate + tumor irradiation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Krishnan R PatelRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: Krishnan.Patel@nih.gov.
Nicholas R RydzewskiRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Erica SchottRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Theresa Cooley-ZgelaRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Holly NingRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jason ChengRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Kilian SalernoRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Erich P HuangBiometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland.
Liza LindenbergMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Esther MenaMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Peter ChoykeMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Baris TurkbeyMolecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Deborah E CitrinRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Targeting mechanisms of radiation resistanceZIABC011552 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CITRIN, DEBORAH · 2014 to 2025
$12.2M
Radiopharmaceutical Imaging and Therapy of CancerZIABC012167 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2024 to 2025
$3.9M
Imaging, image guided biopsy and treatment of prostate cancerZIABC012062 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI TÜRKBEY, BARIS · 2021 to 2025
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNCT03253744 is a phase 1 trial with the primary objective to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of salvage stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with local prostate cancer recurrence after brachytherapy. Additional objectives included biochemical control and imaging response. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This trial was initially designed to test 3 therapeutic dose levels (DLs): 40 Gy (DL1), 42.5 Gy (DL2), and 45 Gy (DL3) in 5 fractions. Intensity modulation was used to deliver the prescription dose to the magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen-based positron emission tomography imaging-defined gross tumor volume while simultaneously delivering 30 Gy to an elective volume defined by the prostate gland. This phase 1 trial followed a 3+3 design with a 3-patient expansion at the MTD. Toxicities were scored until trial completion at 2 years post-SBRT using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Escalation was halted if 2 dose limiting toxicities occurred, defined as any persistent (>4 days) grade 3 toxicity occurring within the first 3 weeks after SBRT or any grade ≥3 genitourinary (GU) or grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity thereafter.

resultsBetween August 2018 and January 2023, 9 patients underwent salvage SBRT and were observed for a median of 22 months (Q1-Q3, 20-43 months). No grade 3 to 5 adverse events related to study treatment were observed; thus, no dose limiting toxicities occurred during the observation period. Escalation was halted by amendment given excellent biochemical control in DL1 and DL2 in the setting of a high incidence of clinically significant late grade 2 GU toxicity. Therefore, the MTD was considered 42.5 Gy in 5 fractions (DL2). One- and 2-year biochemical progression-free survival were 100% and 86%, representing a single patient in the trial cohort with biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] nadir + 2.0) at 20 months posttreatment.

conclusionsThe MTD of salvage SBRT for the treatment of intraprostatic radiorecurrence after brachytherapy was 42.5 Gy in 5 fractions producing an 86% 2-year biochemical progression-free survival rate, with 1 poststudy failure at 20 months. The most frequent clinically significant toxicity was late grade 2 GU toxicity.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyMaximum Tolerated DoseNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgerySalvage TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38428681
PMCPMC11262986
OpenAlexW4392301678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.