Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38428472›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2024

Steric trapping strategy for studying the folding of helical membrane proteins.

Jiaqi Yao, Heedeok Hong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiaqi YaoDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Heedeok HongDepartment of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. Electronic address: honghd@msu.edu.

Funding

Folding and degradation of membrane proteinsR35GM144146 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Heedeok Hong · 2022 to 2026
$1.5M
Folding and degradation of membrane proteinsR01GM118685 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONG, HEEDEOK · 2016 to 2020
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118685NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM144146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidating the folding energy landscape of membrane proteins is essential to the understanding of the proteins' stabilizing forces, folding mechanisms, biogenesis, and quality control. This is not a trivial task because the reversible control of folding is inherently difficult in a lipid bilayer environment. Recently, novel methods have been developed, each of which has a unique strength in investigating specific aspects of membrane protein folding. Among such methods, steric trapping is a versatile strategy allowing a reversible control of membrane protein folding with minimal perturbation of native protein-water and protein-lipid interactions. In a nutshell, steric trapping exploits the coupling of spontaneous denaturation of a doubly biotinylated protein to the simultaneous binding of bulky monovalent streptavidin molecules. This strategy has been evolved to investigate key elements of membrane protein folding such as thermodynamic stability, spontaneous denaturation rates, conformational features of the denatured states, and cooperativity of stabilizing interactions. In this review, we describe the critical methodological advancement, limitation, and outlook of the steric trapping strategy.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsProtein FoldingThermodynamicsBiotinylationLipid BilayersProtein DenaturationStreptavidinLipid BilayersMembrane ProteinsStreptavidinCooperativityDenatured statesMembrane protein foldingMembrane protein stabilityMonovalent streptavidinSteric trapping

Identifiers

PMID38428472
PMCPMC11107808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.