ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024
Prediction of Effectiveness and Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using Real-World Patient Data.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting adverse drug event using machine learning based on electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Merging artificial intelligence into cancer nursing care: Current applications, challenges, and opportunities.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Comparative Risks of Pneumonitis Amongst Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in a diverse patient population: a single-institution experience.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Article
- Advancing Precision Oncology Through Modeling of Longitudinal and Multimodal Data.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Nucleic acid nanobiosystems for cancer theranostics: an overview of emerging trends and challenges.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Advancing precision medicine: Uncovering biomarkers and strategies to mitigate immune-related adverse events in immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy.Toxicology reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing Immunotherapy: The Synergy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with Artificial Intelligence in Melanoma Treatment.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence system for predicting hand-foot skin reaction induced by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Validation of Immune-Related Adverse Event (irAE) Case Definitions in a Real-World Lung Cancer Population.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Article
- Radiomics and Deep Learning Prediction of Immunotherapy-Induced Pneumonitis From Computed Tomography.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Machine-Learning Parsimonious Prediction Model for Diagnostic Screening of Severe Hematological Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors: Retrospective Observational Study by Using the Common Data Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Management of gastrointestinal adverse effects in immune-based combination therapy for advanced renal carcinoma: when the oncologist meets the gastroenterologist.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Updates and emerging trends in the management of immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2024Review
- Unlocking the Gateway: The Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of the p53 Family Driven by the Nuclear Pores and Its Implication for the Therapeutic Approach in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Gut Microbiota Are a Novel Source of Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAlthough immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes in certain patients with cancer, they can also cause life-threatening immunotoxicities. Predicting immunotoxicity risks alongside response could provide a personalized risk-benefit profile, inform therapeutic decision making, and improve clinical trial cohort selection. We aimed to build a machine learning (ML) framework using routine electronic health record (EHR) data to predict hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis, and 1-year overall survival.
methodsReal-world EHR data of more than 2,200 patients treated with ICI through December 31, 2018, were used to develop predictive models. Using a prediction time point of ICI initiation, a 1-year prediction time window was applied to create binary labels for the four outcomes for each patient. Feature engineering involved aggregating laboratory measurements over appropriate time windows (60-365 days). Patients were randomly partitioned into training (80%) and test (20%) sets. Random forest classifiers were developed using a rigorous model development framework.
resultsThe patient cohort had a median age of 63 years and was 61.8% male. Patients predominantly had melanoma (37.8%), lung cancer (27.3%), or genitourinary cancer (16.4%). They were treated with PD-1 (60.4%), PD-L1 (9.0%), and CTLA-4 (19.7%) ICIs. Our models demonstrate reasonably strong performance, with AUCs of 0.739, 0.729, 0.755, and 0.752 for the pneumonitis, hepatitis, colitis, and 1-year overall survival models, respectively. Each model relies on an outcome-specific feature set, though some features are shared among models.
conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first ML solution that assesses individual ICI risk-benefit profiles based predominantly on routine structured EHR data. As such, use of our ML solution will not require additional data collection or documentation in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.