Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427922›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2024

Prediction of Effectiveness and Toxicities of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using Real-World Patient Data.

Levente Lippenszky, Kathleen F Mittendorf, Zoltán Kiss, Michele L LeNoue-Newton, Pablo Napan-Molina, Protiva Rahman, Cheng Ye, Balázs Laczi, Eszter Csernai, Neha M Jain and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Levente LippenszkyScience and Technology Organization-Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, GE HealthCare, Budapest, Hungary/San Ramon, CA.ORCID 0009-0000-7835-2071
Kathleen F MittendorfVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-1097-9171
Zoltán KissScience and Technology Organization-Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, GE HealthCare, Budapest, Hungary/San Ramon, CA.
Michele L LeNoue-NewtonVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-3469-3784
Pablo Napan-MolinaScience and Technology Organization-Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, GE HealthCare, Budapest, Hungary/San Ramon, CA.
Protiva RahmanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-0000-8558
Cheng YeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Balázs LacziScience and Technology Organization-Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, GE HealthCare, Budapest, Hungary/San Ramon, CA.
Eszter CsernaiScience and Technology Organization-Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning, GE HealthCare, Budapest, Hungary/San Ramon, CA.
Neha M JainVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-0168-7874
Marilyn E HoltVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-3164-869X
Christina N MaxwellVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Madeleine BallVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-4491-8548
Yufang MaVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Margaret B MitchellVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-8723-7670
Douglas B JohnsonVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-6390-773X
David S SmithDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-1615-2231
Ben H ParkVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0001-8119-2291
Christine M MicheelVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-7744-9039
Daniel FabbriDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0003-0530-2510
Jan WolberPharmaceutical Diagnostics, GE HealthCare, Chalfont St Giles, United Kingdom.
Travis J OstermanVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-2841-8121
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USSarah Cannon · USTennessee Oncology · USUniversity of Florida · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved outcomes in certain patients with cancer, they can also cause life-threatening immunotoxicities. Predicting immunotoxicity risks alongside response could provide a personalized risk-benefit profile, inform therapeutic decision making, and improve clinical trial cohort selection. We aimed to build a machine learning (ML) framework using routine electronic health record (EHR) data to predict hepatitis, colitis, pneumonitis, and 1-year overall survival.

methodsReal-world EHR data of more than 2,200 patients treated with ICI through December 31, 2018, were used to develop predictive models. Using a prediction time point of ICI initiation, a 1-year prediction time window was applied to create binary labels for the four outcomes for each patient. Feature engineering involved aggregating laboratory measurements over appropriate time windows (60-365 days). Patients were randomly partitioned into training (80%) and test (20%) sets. Random forest classifiers were developed using a rigorous model development framework.

resultsThe patient cohort had a median age of 63 years and was 61.8% male. Patients predominantly had melanoma (37.8%), lung cancer (27.3%), or genitourinary cancer (16.4%). They were treated with PD-1 (60.4%), PD-L1 (9.0%), and CTLA-4 (19.7%) ICIs. Our models demonstrate reasonably strong performance, with AUCs of 0.739, 0.729, 0.755, and 0.752 for the pneumonitis, hepatitis, colitis, and 1-year overall survival models, respectively. Each model relies on an outcome-specific feature set, though some features are shared among models.

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first ML solution that assesses individual ICI risk-benefit profiles based predominantly on routine structured EHR data. As such, use of our ML solution will not require additional data collection or documentation in the clinic.

Indexed as

ColitisHepatitisPneumoniaAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38427922
PMCPMC10919473
OpenAlexW4392391366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.