Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38427914›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Investigating genomic prediction strategies for grain carotenoid traits in a tropical/subtropical maize panel.

Mary-Francis LaPorte, Willy Bayuardi Suwarno, Pattama Hannok, Akiyoshi Koide, Peter Bradbury, José Crossa, Natalia Palacios-Rojas, Christine Helen Diepenbrock

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mary-Francis LaPorteDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5856-2901
Willy Bayuardi SuwarnoDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor 16680, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-7189-7906
Pattama HannokDivision of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Production, Maejo University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7381-182X
Akiyoshi KoideDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Peter BradburyUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3825-8480
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, Texcoco 56130, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855
Natalia Palacios-RojasInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, Texcoco 56130, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3072-4611
Christine Helen DiepenbrockDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8411-0343
University of California, Davis · USCentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo · MXIPB University · IDUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Department of Energy Computational Science Graduate Fellowship DE-SC0021110Office of Advanced Scientific Computing ResearchOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin A deficiency remains prevalent on a global scale, including in regions where maize constitutes a high percentage of human diets. One solution for alleviating this deficiency has been to increase grain concentrations of provitamin A carotenoids in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays L.)-an example of biofortification. The International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) developed a Carotenoid Association Mapping panel of 380 inbred lines adapted to tropical and subtropical environments that have varying grain concentrations of provitamin A and other health-beneficial carotenoids. Several major genes have been identified for these traits, 2 of which have particularly been leveraged in marker-assisted selection. This project assesses the predictive ability of several genomic prediction strategies for maize grain carotenoid traits within and between 4 environments in Mexico. Ridge Regression-Best Linear Unbiased Prediction, Elastic Net, and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces had high predictive abilities for all tested traits (β-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, provitamin A, lutein, and zeaxanthin) and outperformed Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator. Furthermore, predictive abilities were higher when using genome-wide markers rather than only the markers proximal to 2 or 13 genes. These findings suggest that genomic prediction models using genome-wide markers (and assuming equal variance of marker effects) are worthwhile for these traits even though key genes have already been identified, especially if breeding for additional grain carotenoid traits alongside β-carotene. Predictive ability was maintained for all traits except lutein in between-environment prediction. The TASSEL (Trait Analysis by aSSociation, Evolution, and Linkage) Genomic Selection plugin performed as well as other more computationally intensive methods for within-environment prediction. The findings observed herein indicate the utility of genomic prediction methods for these traits and could inform their resource-efficient implementation in biofortification breeding programs.

Indexed as

CarotenoidsGenomicsZea maysEdible GrainGenome, PlantPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociCarotenoidsbiofortificationcarotenoidsgenomic predictionmaizeprovitamin A

Identifiers

PMID38427914
PMCPMC11075567
OpenAlexW4392364189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.